PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFH vs. FXO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFH vs. FXO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund (FXO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than FXO's 12.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VFH having a 13.37% annualized return and FXO not far behind at 13.29%.


VFH

1D
0.89%
1M
4.10%
6M
9.11%
YTD
7.22%
1Y
13.83%
3Y*
20.82%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
13.37%
ALL TIME*
7.02%

FXO

1D
0.71%
1M
4.66%
6M
10.72%
YTD
12.28%
1Y
20.77%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
11.44%
10Y*
13.29%
ALL TIME*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.33M$3.32M$3.46M
$53.77M$71.76M$72.54M

VFH vs. FXO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
7.22%14.91%30.44%14.17%-12.31%35.22%-1.96%31.57%-13.52%19.99%
FXO
First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund
12.28%13.59%27.72%9.28%-9.24%37.76%5.95%26.31%-11.72%17.88%

Correlation

The correlation between VFH and FXO is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.90

The correlation between VFH and FXO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFH vs. FXO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFH
FXO

Financial Services

97.0%
94.8%

Technology

2.0%
0.5%

Real Estate

0.8%
4.8%

Industrials

0.2%

-

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

VFH
97.0%
FXO
94.8%

Technology

VFH
2.0%
FXO
0.5%

Real Estate

VFH
0.8%
FXO
4.8%

Industrials

VFH
0.2%
FXO

-

Healthcare

VFH
0.1%
FXO

-

Communication Services

VFH
0.0%
FXO

-

Consumer Cyclical

VFH
0.0%
FXO

-

Basic Materials

VFH

-

FXO

-

Consumer Defensive

VFH

-

FXO

-

Energy

VFH

-

FXO

-

Utilities

VFH

-

FXO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFH vs. FXO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VFH
VFH Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FXO
FXO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VFH vs. FXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund (FXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFHFXODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.24

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

1.78

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.45

5.33

-2.88

VFH vs. FXO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFH Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the FXO Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFH and FXO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFH vs. FXO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, which is greater than FXO's maximum drawdown of -71.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and FXO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFHFXODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.61%

-71.30%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

-11.72%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.30%

-21.35%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-28.80%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.42%

-48.55%

+4.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.42%

-13.01%

-5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

3.91%

+1.76%

Volatility

VFH vs. FXO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) is 3.94%, while First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund (FXO) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that VFH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFHFXODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

4.15%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

11.07%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

15.51%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.13%

21.72%

-2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.48%

24.06%

-1.58%

VFH vs. FXO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FXO's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFH vs. FXO - Dividend Comparison

VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than FXO's 1.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXO
First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund
1.95%1.78%1.97%2.98%2.49%1.91%2.60%1.72%2.60%1.62%1.35%1.51%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.64%1.55%1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, VFH and FXO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FXO has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to VFH (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFH dropped -78.61% vs FXO's -71.30%.

On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 13.37% vs 13.29% for FXO. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 13.37% return vs 13.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for FXO.

FXO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.64% for VFH.

VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while FXO tracks StrataQuant Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFH and 0.62% for FXO.

FXO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFH and FXO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer