FXO vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund (FXO) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
FXO and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FXO is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the StrataQuant Financials Index. It was launched on May 8, 2007. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. Both FXO and COWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FXO or COWZ.
Performance
FXO vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXO achieves a 32.81% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 15.32% return.
FXO
32.81%
4.75%
21.42%
47.85%
14.60%
11.89%
COWZ
15.32%
0.53%
6.81%
21.41%
16.77%
N/A
Key characteristics
FXO | COWZ | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 2.84 | 1.70 |
Sortino Ratio | 4.02 | 2.46 |
Omega Ratio | 1.50 | 1.29 |
Calmar Ratio | 3.17 | 3.03 |
Martin Ratio | 19.02 | 7.18 |
Ulcer Index | 2.60% | 3.19% |
Daily Std Dev | 17.41% | 13.51% |
Max Drawdown | -71.30% | -38.63% |
Current Drawdown | -0.53% | -1.91% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FXO vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXO has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FXO and COWZ is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FXO vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund (FXO) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FXO vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
FXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than COWZ's 1.84% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund | 1.93% | 2.98% | 2.49% | 1.91% | 2.60% | 1.72% | 2.60% | 1.62% | 1.35% | 1.51% | 1.53% | 1.21% |
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.84% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FXO vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXO drawdown since its inception was -71.30%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXO and COWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FXO vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund (FXO) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 4.11%. This indicates that FXO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.