VEU vs. XLG
VEU (Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World ex US Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEU returned 10.40%/yr vs 17.23%/yr for XLG. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VEU charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.
Performance
VEU vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEU achieves a 15.75% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 5.56% return. Over the past 10 years, VEU has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 10.40%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.23% annualized return.
VEU
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 15.75%
- 6M
- 17.16%
- 1Y
- 32.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
XLG
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- 1Y
- 25.51%
- 3Y*
- 22.53%
- 5Y*
- 15.57%
- 10Y*
- 17.23%
VEU vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF | 15.75% | 32.35% | 5.56% | 15.84% | -15.58% | 8.27% | 11.10% | 21.83% | -14.18% | 27.40% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 5.56% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEU and XLG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2007 | 0.78 |
The correlation between VEU and XLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (3 years) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VEU vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEU
XLG
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
VEU
XLG
Technology
VEU
XLG
Industrials
VEU
XLG
Consumer Cyclical
VEU
XLG
Basic Materials
VEU
XLG
Healthcare
VEU
XLG
Energy
VEU
XLG
Consumer Defensive
VEU
XLG
Communication Services
VEU
XLG
Utilities
VEU
XLG
-
Real Estate
VEU
XLG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEU vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
VEU
XLG
VEU vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEU | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.33 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 2.06 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | 7.55 | +3.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEU vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEU drawdown since its inception was -61.52%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEU and XLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEU | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.52% | -52.39% | -9.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -12.41% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.69% | -20.70% | +7.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -28.02% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.98% | -30.46% | -4.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.28% | +3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.11% | -7.64% | -5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 3.39% | -0.41% |
Volatility
VEU vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 4.58%. This indicates that VEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEU | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 4.58% | +2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.12% | 10.57% | +3.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.19% | 13.78% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 18.76% | -2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 18.88% | -1.62% |
VEU vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEU has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VEU vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
VEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than XLG's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF | 2.58% | 3.09% | 3.24% | 3.32% | 3.12% | 3.08% | 2.00% | 3.10% | 3.27% | 2.66% | 2.96% | 2.95% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.61% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEU and XLG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEU has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to XLG (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEU dropped -61.52% vs XLG's -52.39%.
On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.23% vs 10.40% for VEU. On fees, VEU is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.23% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEU is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.
VEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 0.61% for XLG.
VEU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. VEU tracks FTSE All-World ex US Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VEU and 0.20% for XLG.
VEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEU and XLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer