VEM vs. PIE
VEM (Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) and PIE (Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Virtus, while PIE is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. VEM is actively managed, while PIE is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VEM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for PIE.
Performance
VEM vs. PIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VEM
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PIE
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- 6M
- 32.18%
- YTD
- 38.56%
- 1Y
- 59.11%
- 3Y*
- 22.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
VEM vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VEM Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 8.93% |
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 26.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEM and PIE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEM vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank
VEM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PIE
VEM vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (VEM) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEM | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEM vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEM drawdown since its inception was -13.55%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEM and PIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEM | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.55% | -72.98% | +59.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.85% | -5.21% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -25.96% | +21.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.36% | — |
Volatility
VEM vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEM | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.97% | 25.02% | +5.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.97% | 21.02% | +9.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.97% | 21.62% | +9.35% |
VEM vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEM vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison
VEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than PIE's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.75% | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.59% | 3.45% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 2.29% | 3.32% | 1.63% | 1.48% | 0.80% |
VEM Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEM and PIE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.
VEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 1.75% for PIE.
VEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PIE is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for VEM and 0.90% for PIE.
Find the right allocation for VEM and PIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer