VEM vs. DBEM
VEM (Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) and DBEM (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. VEM is actively managed, while DBEM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. VEM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DBEM.
Performance
VEM vs. DBEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VEM
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DBEM
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -10.19%
- 6M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 14.84%
- 1Y
- 30.90%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- 8.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $227.66K | $801.76K | $507.71K | |
| $1.18K | $2.76K | $6.90K |
VEM vs. DBEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VEM Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 2.66% |
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF | 5.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEM and DBEM is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.95 |
VEM vs. DBEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEM
DBEM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Technology
VEM
DBEM
Financial Services
VEM
DBEM
Industrials
VEM
DBEM
Basic Materials
VEM
DBEM
Energy
VEM
DBEM
Consumer Cyclical
VEM
DBEM
Consumer Defensive
VEM
DBEM
Communication Services
VEM
DBEM
Utilities
VEM
DBEM
Real Estate
VEM
DBEM
Healthcare
VEM
-
DBEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEM vs. DBEM — Risk / Return Rank
VEM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DBEM
VEM vs. DBEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (VEM) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEM | DBEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEM vs. DBEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEM drawdown since its inception was -13.55%, smaller than the maximum DBEM drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEM and DBEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEM | DBEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.55% | -33.51% | +19.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.26% | -14.90% | +3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -11.64% | +7.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.95% | — |
Volatility
VEM vs. DBEM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEM | DBEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.70% | 22.16% | +8.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.70% | 17.92% | +12.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.70% | 17.54% | +13.16% |
VEM vs. DBEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DBEM's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEM vs. DBEM - Dividend Comparison
VEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than DBEM's 2.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF | 2.30% | 1.84% | 2.48% | 2.55% | 2.65% | 1.77% | 1.74% | 2.59% | 2.85% | 1.51% | 1.59% | 3.49% |
VEM Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VEM and DBEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VEM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DBEM.
DBEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 2.14% for VEM.
They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for VEM and 0.66% for DBEM.
Find the right allocation for VEM and DBEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer