PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 31.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VEA having a 10.14% annualized return and XLE not far behind at 10.02%.


VEA

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
12.02%
6M
14.95%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.14%

XLE

1D
1.14%
1M
4.72%
YTD
31.32%
6M
30.37%
1Y
44.35%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
20.33%
10Y*
10.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
12.02%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
31.32%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and XLE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007

0.60

The correlation between VEA and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VEA vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
XLE

Financial Services

23.3%

-

Industrials

19.2%

-

Technology

13.8%

-

Healthcare

8.2%

-

Basic Materials

7.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.6%

-

Energy

5.4%
100.0%

Communication Services

3.4%

-

Utilities

3.3%

-

Real Estate

2.7%

-

Financial Services

VEA
23.3%
XLE

-

Industrials

VEA
19.2%
XLE

-

Technology

VEA
13.8%
XLE

-

Healthcare

VEA
8.2%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

VEA
7.5%
XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.5%
XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.6%
XLE

-

Energy

VEA
5.4%
XLE
100.0%

Communication Services

VEA
3.4%
XLE

-

Utilities

VEA
3.3%
XLE

-

Real Estate

VEA
2.7%
XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEAXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

3.70

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

10.59

-1.20

VEA vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEAXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.18

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.79

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.34

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.31

-0.07

Drawdowns

VEA vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEAXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-71.26%

+10.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-12.05%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-20.14%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-26.04%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-66.81%

+31.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-6.76%

+3.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-17.98%

+4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

4.20%

-1.20%

Volatility

VEA vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) is 6.03%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 7.07%. This indicates that VEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEAXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

7.07%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

16.58%

-2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

20.48%

-4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

26.03%

-9.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

29.58%

-12.18%

VEA vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEA vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than XLE's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.69%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.56%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and XLE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to VEA (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.14% vs 10.02% for XLE. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.14% return vs 10.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLE.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.56% for XLE.

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer