VEA vs. VB
VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEA returned 11.06%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for VB. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.
Performance
VEA vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 15.68% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 11.06%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.79% annualized return.
VEA
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- 1Y
- 35.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.37%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
VB
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 15.68%
- 6M
- 13.00%
- 1Y
- 30.17%
- 3Y*
- 17.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.79%
VEA vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 16.69% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 15.68% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEA and VB is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007 | 0.78 |
The correlation between VEA and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
VEA vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEA
VB
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
VEA
VB
Industrials
VEA
VB
Technology
VEA
VB
Healthcare
VEA
VB
Basic Materials
VEA
VB
Consumer Cyclical
VEA
VB
Consumer Defensive
VEA
VB
Energy
VEA
VB
Communication Services
VEA
VB
Utilities
VEA
VB
Real Estate
VEA
VB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEA vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
VEA
VB
VEA vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEA | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.31 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 3.38 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.80 | 12.38 | -0.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEA vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, roughly equal to the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEA | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.68% | -59.56% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -8.98% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -25.36% | +11.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -28.15% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | -42.05% | +6.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.39% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.26% | -8.42% | -4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 2.44% | +0.57% |
Volatility
VEA vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 4.92%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEA | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.32% | 4.92% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.39% | 12.21% | +2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.52% | 16.66% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 20.78% | -4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 21.45% | -4.07% |
VEA vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VEA vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than VB's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.50% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEA and VB have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to VB (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs VB's -59.56%.
On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.79% vs 11.06% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.79% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VB.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 1.18% for VB.
VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.05% for VB.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEA and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer