PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. SCHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 22.49% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has underperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 10.72%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.55% annualized return.


VEA

1D
0.34%
1M
1.30%
YTD
14.73%
6M
16.65%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
10.72%

SCHA

1D
1.16%
1M
5.29%
YTD
22.49%
6M
19.84%
1Y
41.48%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.73%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
22.49%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and SCHA is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.76

The correlation between VEA and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEA vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
SCHA

Financial Services

23.3%
15.3%

Industrials

19.2%
15.6%

Technology

13.8%
23.9%

Healthcare

8.2%
13.2%

Basic Materials

7.5%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
2.5%

Energy

5.4%
5.4%

Communication Services

3.4%
2.3%

Utilities

3.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.7%
5.9%

Financial Services

VEA
23.3%
SCHA
15.3%

Industrials

VEA
19.2%
SCHA
15.6%

Technology

VEA
13.8%
SCHA
23.9%

Healthcare

VEA
8.2%
SCHA
13.2%

Basic Materials

VEA
7.5%
SCHA
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.5%
SCHA
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.6%
SCHA
2.5%

Energy

VEA
5.4%
SCHA
5.4%

Communication Services

VEA
3.4%
SCHA
2.3%

Utilities

VEA
3.3%
SCHA
2.3%

Real Estate

VEA
2.7%
SCHA
5.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEASCHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

4.38

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.92

16.08

-6.17

VEA vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEA vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and SCHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEASCHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-42.41%

-18.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-9.50%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-27.29%

+13.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-30.79%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-42.41%

+6.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

0.00%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-7.57%

-5.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.59%

+0.43%

Volatility

VEA vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) have volatilities of 6.84% and 6.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEASCHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.84%

6.62%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

13.67%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.58%

18.62%

-2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

22.03%

-5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

22.75%

-5.35%

VEA vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEA vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than SCHA's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
0.98%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and SCHA have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to SCHA (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs SCHA's -42.41%.

On 10-year performance, SCHA leads with 11.55% vs 10.72% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHA has been the lower-risk option at 6.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 11.55% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHA.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.98% for SCHA.

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SCHA is Small Cap Blend Equities. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.04% for SCHA.

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and SCHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer