VEA vs. IWD
VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and IWD (iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while IWD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEA returned 10.14%/yr vs 11.13%/yr for IWD. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IWD.
Performance
VEA vs. IWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly lower than IWD's 13.23% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has underperformed IWD with an annualized return of 10.14%, while IWD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.13% annualized return.
VEA
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
IWD
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 6M
- 14.44%
- 1Y
- 26.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
VEA vs. IWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 12.02% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 13.23% | 15.68% | 14.17% | 11.34% | -7.75% | 24.95% | 2.73% | 26.12% | -8.45% | 13.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEA and IWD is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007 | 0.82 |
The correlation between VEA and IWD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
VEA vs. IWD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEA
IWD
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
VEA
IWD
Industrials
VEA
IWD
Technology
VEA
IWD
Healthcare
VEA
IWD
Basic Materials
VEA
IWD
Consumer Cyclical
VEA
IWD
Consumer Defensive
VEA
IWD
Energy
VEA
IWD
Communication Services
VEA
IWD
Utilities
VEA
IWD
Real Estate
VEA
IWD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEA vs. IWD — Risk / Return Rank
VEA
IWD
VEA vs. IWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VEA | IWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.44 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 3.93 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.39 | 16.40 | -7.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VEA | IWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.44 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.69 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.65 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.42 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
VEA vs. IWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, roughly equal to the maximum IWD drawdown of -60.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and IWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEA | IWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.68% | -60.10% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -6.79% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -15.71% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -19.04% | -10.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | -38.51% | +2.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | -1.56% | -1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.29% | -8.65% | -4.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 1.62% | +1.38% |
Volatility
VEA vs. IWD - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) at 3.18%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEA | IWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 3.18% | +2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | 8.30% | +5.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.15% | 10.94% | +5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 14.83% | +1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 17.30% | +0.10% |
VEA vs. IWD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IWD's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VEA vs. IWD - Dividend Comparison
VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than IWD's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 1.51% | 1.69% | 1.87% | 2.02% | 2.15% | 1.62% | 2.05% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.09% | 2.25% | 2.47% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.69% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEA and IWD have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to IWD (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs IWD's -60.10%.
On 10-year performance, IWD leads with 11.13% vs 10.14% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IWD has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWD has performed better with a 11.13% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IWD.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.51% for IWD.
VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IWD is Large Cap Value Equities. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while IWD tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.18% for IWD.
IWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEA and IWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer