PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. IMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. IMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly lower than IMOM's 16.29% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has outperformed IMOM with an annualized return of 10.72%, while IMOM has yielded a comparatively lower 7.94% annualized return.


VEA

1D
0.34%
1M
3.58%
YTD
14.73%
6M
16.65%
1Y
31.41%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
10.72%

IMOM

1D
1.30%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
16.29%
6M
18.55%
1Y
39.37%
3Y*
23.40%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
7.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. IMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.73%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
IMOM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
16.29%47.20%5.22%9.15%-21.92%-0.75%28.39%18.26%-23.07%34.83%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and IMOM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.76

The correlation between VEA and IMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEA vs. IMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
IMOM

Financial Services

23.3%
4.2%

Industrials

19.2%
31.2%

Technology

13.8%
18.7%

Healthcare

8.2%
3.3%

Basic Materials

7.5%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%

-

Energy

5.4%
10.3%

Communication Services

3.4%
6.3%

Utilities

3.3%
10.7%

Real Estate

2.7%
4.2%

Financial Services

VEA
23.3%
IMOM
4.2%

Industrials

VEA
19.2%
IMOM
31.2%

Technology

VEA
13.8%
IMOM
18.7%

Healthcare

VEA
8.2%
IMOM
3.3%

Basic Materials

VEA
7.5%
IMOM
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.5%
IMOM
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.6%
IMOM

-

Energy

VEA
5.4%
IMOM
10.3%

Communication Services

VEA
3.4%
IMOM
6.3%

Utilities

VEA
3.3%
IMOM
10.7%

Real Estate

VEA
2.7%
IMOM
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. IMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

IMOM
IMOM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. IMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEAIMOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

2.52

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.92

10.23

-0.32

VEA vs. IMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the IMOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and IMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEA vs. IMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than IMOM's maximum drawdown of -45.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and IMOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEAIMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-45.74%

-14.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-15.61%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-17.51%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-39.27%

+9.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-45.74%

+10.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-3.90%

+2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-14.15%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

3.84%

-0.82%

Volatility

VEA vs. IMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) is 6.84%, while Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that VEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEAIMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.84%

8.31%

-1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

17.95%

-3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.58%

20.49%

-3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

20.04%

-3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

20.30%

-2.90%

VEA vs. IMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IMOM's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEA vs. IMOM - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than IMOM's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMOM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
2.17%2.53%4.52%2.95%6.06%1.27%0.59%1.17%0.78%1.11%0.54%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and IMOM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMOM has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to VEA (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs IMOM's -45.74%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.72% vs 7.94% for IMOM. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 6.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 7.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IMOM.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 2.17% for IMOM.

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IMOM is Momentum. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while IMOM tracks Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.38% for IMOM.

IMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and IMOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer