IMOM vs. FEZ
IMOM (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF) and FEZ (State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR), while FEZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMOM returned 7.38%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for FEZ. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMOM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FEZ.
Performance
IMOM vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMOM achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly higher than FEZ's 6.43% return. Over the past 10 years, IMOM has underperformed FEZ with an annualized return of 7.38%, while FEZ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.
IMOM
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 36.25%
- 3Y*
- 23.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.09%
- 10Y*
- 7.38%
FEZ
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 6.43%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- 1Y
- 19.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
IMOM vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 13.79% | 47.20% | 5.22% | 9.15% | -21.92% | -0.75% | 28.39% | 18.26% | -23.07% | 34.83% |
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 6.43% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | 24.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMOM and FEZ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.69 |
The correlation between IMOM and FEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
IMOM vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMOM
FEZ
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
IMOM
FEZ
Technology
IMOM
FEZ
Basic Materials
IMOM
FEZ
Utilities
IMOM
FEZ
Energy
IMOM
FEZ
Communication Services
IMOM
FEZ
Financial Services
IMOM
FEZ
Real Estate
IMOM
FEZ
-
Healthcare
IMOM
FEZ
Consumer Cyclical
IMOM
FEZ
Consumer Defensive
IMOM
-
FEZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMOM vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank
IMOM
FEZ
IMOM vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMOM | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.19 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 1.42 | +0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.33 | 4.82 | +4.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMOM vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMOM drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, smaller than the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOM and FEZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMOM | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.74% | -64.21% | +18.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.61% | -13.63% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.51% | -15.85% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.27% | -35.05% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.74% | -39.69% | -6.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.97% | -2.33% | -3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.13% | -17.04% | +2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 3.99% | -0.09% |
Volatility
IMOM vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) has a higher volatility of 8.35% compared to State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) at 5.85%. This indicates that IMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMOM | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.35% | 5.85% | +2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.24% | 15.57% | +2.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.70% | 18.40% | +2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 20.70% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 20.75% | -0.47% |
IMOM vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMOM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMOM vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison
IMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than FEZ's 2.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.64% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 2.22% | 2.53% | 4.52% | 2.95% | 6.06% | 1.27% | 0.59% | 1.17% | 0.78% | 1.11% | 0.54% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMOM and FEZ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMOM has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to FEZ (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMOM dropped -45.74% vs FEZ's -64.21%.
On 10-year performance, FEZ leads with 11.53% vs 7.38% for IMOM. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FEZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 11.53% return vs 7.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IMOM.
FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 2.22% for IMOM.
IMOM is categorized as Momentum, while FEZ is Europe Equities. IMOM tracks Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR), while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IMOM and 0.29% for FEZ.
IMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMOM and FEZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer