PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMOM vs. FEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMOM vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMOM achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly higher than FEZ's 6.43% return. Over the past 10 years, IMOM has underperformed FEZ with an annualized return of 7.38%, while FEZ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.


IMOM

1D
-2.92%
1M
-3.30%
YTD
13.79%
6M
13.08%
1Y
36.25%
3Y*
23.30%
5Y*
8.09%
10Y*
7.38%

FEZ

1D
-1.75%
1M
1.84%
YTD
6.43%
6M
6.45%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMOM vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMOM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
13.79%47.20%5.22%9.15%-21.92%-0.75%28.39%18.26%-23.07%34.83%
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
6.43%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%

Correlation

The correlation between IMOM and FEZ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.69

The correlation between IMOM and FEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMOM vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMOM
FEZ

Industrials

31.2%
19.3%

Technology

18.7%
19.6%

Basic Materials

14.5%
3.8%

Utilities

10.7%
5.0%

Energy

10.3%
5.3%

Communication Services

6.3%
2.6%

Financial Services

4.2%
23.8%

Real Estate

4.2%

-

Healthcare

3.3%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.9%

Industrials

IMOM
31.2%
FEZ
19.3%

Technology

IMOM
18.7%
FEZ
19.6%

Basic Materials

IMOM
14.5%
FEZ
3.8%

Utilities

IMOM
10.7%
FEZ
5.0%

Energy

IMOM
10.3%
FEZ
5.3%

Communication Services

IMOM
6.3%
FEZ
2.6%

Financial Services

IMOM
4.2%
FEZ
23.8%

Real Estate

IMOM
4.2%
FEZ

-

Healthcare

IMOM
3.3%
FEZ
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IMOM
1.7%
FEZ
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

IMOM

-

FEZ
5.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMOM vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMOM
IMOM Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMOM vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMOMFEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.19

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

1.42

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.33

4.82

+4.51

IMOM vs. FEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the FEZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMOM and FEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMOM vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMOM drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, smaller than the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOM and FEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMOMFEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.74%

-64.21%

+18.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.61%

-13.63%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.51%

-15.85%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.27%

-35.05%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.74%

-39.69%

-6.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.97%

-2.33%

-3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.13%

-17.04%

+2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

3.99%

-0.09%

Volatility

IMOM vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) has a higher volatility of 8.35% compared to State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) at 5.85%. This indicates that IMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMOMFEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.35%

5.85%

+2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.24%

15.57%

+2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.70%

18.40%

+2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.07%

20.70%

-0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.28%

20.75%

-0.47%

IMOM vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMOM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMOM vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison

IMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than FEZ's 2.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.64%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
IMOM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
2.22%2.53%4.52%2.95%6.06%1.27%0.59%1.17%0.78%1.11%0.54%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMOM and FEZ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMOM has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to FEZ (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMOM dropped -45.74% vs FEZ's -64.21%.

On 10-year performance, FEZ leads with 11.53% vs 7.38% for IMOM. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FEZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 11.53% return vs 7.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IMOM.

FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 2.22% for IMOM.

IMOM is categorized as Momentum, while FEZ is Europe Equities. IMOM tracks Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR), while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IMOM and 0.29% for FEZ.

IMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMOM and FEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer