PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMOM vs. IMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMOM vs. IMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMOM achieves a 17.21% return, which is significantly higher than IMTM's 14.59% return. Over the past 10 years, IMOM has underperformed IMTM with an annualized return of 7.70%, while IMTM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.52% annualized return.


IMOM

1D
1.08%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
17.21%
6M
17.04%
1Y
40.78%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
7.70%

IMTM

1D
1.12%
1M
4.15%
YTD
14.59%
6M
14.54%
1Y
29.54%
3Y*
22.75%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
10.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMOM vs. IMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMOM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
17.21%47.20%5.22%9.15%-21.92%-0.75%28.39%18.26%-23.07%34.83%
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
14.59%34.50%12.17%13.89%-16.81%3.50%22.17%24.52%-14.31%25.46%

Correlation

The correlation between IMOM and IMTM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.81

The correlation between IMOM and IMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMOM vs. IMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMOM
IMTM

Industrials

31.2%
15.5%

Technology

18.7%
15.6%

Basic Materials

14.5%
9.7%

Utilities

10.7%
5.3%

Energy

10.3%
10.0%

Communication Services

6.3%
1.5%

Financial Services

4.2%
28.6%

Real Estate

4.2%
1.1%

Healthcare

3.3%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.1%

Industrials

IMOM
31.2%
IMTM
15.5%

Technology

IMOM
18.7%
IMTM
15.6%

Basic Materials

IMOM
14.5%
IMTM
9.7%

Utilities

IMOM
10.7%
IMTM
5.3%

Energy

IMOM
10.3%
IMTM
10.0%

Communication Services

IMOM
6.3%
IMTM
1.5%

Financial Services

IMOM
4.2%
IMTM
28.6%

Real Estate

IMOM
4.2%
IMTM
1.1%

Healthcare

IMOM
3.3%
IMTM
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IMOM
1.7%
IMTM
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

IMOM

-

IMTM
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMOM vs. IMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMOM
IMOM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

IMTM
IMTM Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
IMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMOM vs. IMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMOMIMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.30

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.31

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.55

9.15

+1.39

IMOM vs. IMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the IMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMOM and IMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMOM vs. IMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMOM drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, which is greater than IMTM's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOM and IMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMOMIMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.74%

-32.66%

-13.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.61%

-12.85%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.51%

-12.85%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.27%

-32.66%

-6.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.74%

-32.66%

-13.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

0.00%

-3.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.13%

-7.42%

-6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

3.24%

+0.64%

Volatility

IMOM vs. IMTM - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) has a higher volatility of 7.84% compared to iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) at 6.62%. This indicates that IMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMOMIMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.84%

6.62%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.99%

16.04%

+1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.51%

17.95%

+2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.03%

17.80%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

17.59%

+2.67%

IMOM vs. IMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMOM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IMTM's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMOM vs. IMTM - Dividend Comparison

IMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than IMTM's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMOM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
2.16%2.53%4.52%2.95%6.06%1.27%0.59%1.17%0.78%1.11%0.54%0.00%
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
4.28%4.70%2.93%2.29%2.68%2.51%0.97%2.13%2.36%1.92%2.75%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMOM and IMTM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMOM has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to IMTM (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMOM dropped -45.74% vs IMTM's -32.66%.

On 10-year performance, IMTM leads with 10.52% vs 7.70% for IMOM. On fees, IMTM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, IMTM has been the lower-risk option at 6.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IMTM has performed better with a 10.52% return vs 7.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMTM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IMOM.

IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 2.16% for IMOM.

IMOM tracks Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR), while IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IMOM and 0.30% for IMTM.

IMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMOM and IMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer