PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. FDTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. FDTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly lower than FDTS's 18.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VEA having a 10.72% annualized return and FDTS not far ahead at 10.96%.


VEA

1D
0.34%
1M
3.58%
YTD
14.73%
6M
16.65%
1Y
31.41%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
10.72%

FDTS

1D
-0.17%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
18.78%
6M
20.77%
1Y
44.72%
3Y*
24.70%
5Y*
10.78%
10Y*
10.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. FDTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.73%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
18.78%51.17%2.44%10.96%-15.34%11.79%12.90%18.71%-23.71%36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and FDTS is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2012

0.55

Over the past year, VEA and FDTS have become more correlated (0.86) than their long-term average of 0.55, meaning their price movements have been converging.

VEA vs. FDTS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
FDTS

Financial Services

23.3%
11.9%

Industrials

19.2%
22.2%

Technology

13.8%
14.1%

Healthcare

8.2%
2.8%

Basic Materials

7.5%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
18.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
4.7%

Energy

5.4%
4.0%

Communication Services

3.4%
3.2%

Utilities

3.3%
2.7%

Real Estate

2.7%
4.3%

Financial Services

VEA
23.3%
FDTS
11.9%

Industrials

VEA
19.2%
FDTS
22.2%

Technology

VEA
13.8%
FDTS
14.1%

Healthcare

VEA
8.2%
FDTS
2.8%

Basic Materials

VEA
7.5%
FDTS
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.5%
FDTS
18.9%

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.6%
FDTS
4.7%

Energy

VEA
5.4%
FDTS
4.0%

Communication Services

VEA
3.4%
FDTS
3.2%

Utilities

VEA
3.3%
FDTS
2.7%

Real Estate

VEA
2.7%
FDTS
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. FDTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FDTS
FDTS Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FDTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. FDTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEAFDTSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

3.43

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.92

11.78

-1.86

VEA vs. FDTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the FDTS Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and FDTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEA vs. FDTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than FDTS's maximum drawdown of -51.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and FDTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEAFDTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-51.26%

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-12.61%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-13.19%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-33.11%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-51.26%

+15.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-4.77%

+3.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-10.64%

-2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

3.66%

-0.64%

Volatility

VEA vs. FDTS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) is 6.84%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) has a volatility of 8.44%. This indicates that VEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEAFDTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.84%

8.44%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

15.54%

-1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.58%

18.27%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

29.42%

-12.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

24.92%

-7.52%

VEA vs. FDTS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FDTS's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEA vs. FDTS - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than FDTS's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
2.53%2.94%3.94%2.90%3.71%3.01%2.02%2.30%1.96%2.08%1.78%1.73%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and FDTS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDTS has higher volatility (8.44%) compared to VEA (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs FDTS's -51.26%.

On 10-year performance, FDTS leads with 10.96% vs 10.72% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 6.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDTS has performed better with a 10.96% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDTS.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 2.53% for FDTS.

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FDTS is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while FDTS tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.80% for FDTS.

FDTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and FDTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer