VEA vs. EWJ
VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and EWJ (iShares MSCI Japan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while EWJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEA returned 10.72%/yr vs 9.55%/yr for EWJ. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWJ.
Performance
VEA vs. EWJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VEA having a 14.73% return and EWJ slightly higher at 14.83%. Over the past 10 years, VEA has outperformed EWJ with an annualized return of 10.72%, while EWJ has yielded a comparatively lower 9.55% annualized return.
VEA
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 6M
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 31.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
EWJ
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 14.83%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- 1Y
- 31.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
VEA vs. EWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.73% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 14.83% | 25.84% | 7.03% | 20.29% | -17.72% | 1.16% | 15.40% | 19.34% | -14.10% | 24.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEA and EWJ is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007 | 0.81 |
The correlation between VEA and EWJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
VEA vs. EWJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEA
EWJ
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
VEA
EWJ
Industrials
VEA
EWJ
Technology
VEA
EWJ
Healthcare
VEA
EWJ
Basic Materials
VEA
EWJ
Consumer Cyclical
VEA
EWJ
Consumer Defensive
VEA
EWJ
Energy
VEA
EWJ
Communication Services
VEA
EWJ
Utilities
VEA
EWJ
Real Estate
VEA
EWJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEA vs. EWJ — Risk / Return Rank
VEA
EWJ
VEA vs. EWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEA | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.28 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 2.27 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.92 | 7.62 | +2.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEA vs. EWJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, roughly equal to the maximum EWJ drawdown of -60.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and EWJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEA | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.68% | -60.93% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -13.59% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -14.68% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -33.14% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | -33.14% | -2.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -1.51% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.28% | -21.72% | +8.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 4.04% | -1.02% |
Volatility
VEA vs. EWJ - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) at 6.31%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEA | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 6.31% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 15.96% | -1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.58% | 20.23% | -3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 18.38% | -1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 17.33% | +0.07% |
VEA vs. EWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EWJ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEA vs. EWJ - Dividend Comparison
VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than EWJ's 3.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 3.94% | 4.52% | 2.34% | 2.03% | 1.23% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 2.03% | 1.71% | 1.25% | 1.95% | 1.27% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEA and EWJ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to EWJ (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs EWJ's -60.93%.
On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.72% vs 9.55% for EWJ. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EWJ has been the lower-risk option at 6.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 9.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWJ.
EWJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.
VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EWJ is Japan Equities. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.49% for EWJ.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEA and EWJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer