PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWJ vs. ^N225
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EWJ vs. ^N225 - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and Nikkei 225 (^N225). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EWJ is traded in USD, while ^N225 is traded in JPY. To make them comparable, the ^N225 values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWJ achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly lower than ^N225's 39.19% return. Over the past 10 years, EWJ has underperformed ^N225 with an annualized return of 9.57%, while ^N225 has yielded a comparatively higher 11.84% annualized return.


EWJ

1D
-4.35%
1M
1.79%
YTD
15.50%
6M
14.93%
1Y
34.33%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
9.57%

^N225

1D
0.00%
1M
12.58%
YTD
39.19%
6M
38.77%
1Y
70.69%
3Y*
25.23%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
11.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWJ vs. ^N225 - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWJ
iShares MSCI Japan ETF
15.50%25.84%7.03%20.29%-17.72%1.16%15.40%19.34%-14.10%24.27%
^N225
Nikkei 225
39.19%26.56%7.17%19.21%-20.48%-5.90%22.42%19.73%-10.20%23.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EWJ and ^N225 is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2007

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWJ vs. ^N225 — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWJ
EWJ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
EWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

^N225
^N225 Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
^N225 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^N225 Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
^N225 Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
^N225 Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
^N225 Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWJ vs. ^N225 - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and Nikkei 225 (^N225). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWJ^N225Difference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.44

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

4.81

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.52

15.37

-6.85

EWJ vs. ^N225 - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the ^N225 Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWJ and ^N225, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWJ vs. ^N225 - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWJ drawdown since its inception was -60.93%, which is greater than ^N225's maximum drawdown of -52.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWJ and ^N225.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWJ^N225Difference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.93%

-52.23%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.59%

-14.75%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.68%

-24.78%

+10.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.14%

-36.26%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.14%

-37.97%

+4.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.35%

0.00%

-4.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.70%

-13.56%

-8.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

4.53%

-0.49%

Volatility

EWJ vs. ^N225 - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) is 8.05%, while Nikkei 225 (^N225) has a volatility of 8.55%. This indicates that EWJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^N225 based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWJ^N225Difference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.05%

8.55%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.67%

21.28%

-4.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.71%

26.28%

-5.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.50%

23.87%

-5.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.33%

21.57%

-4.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWJ and ^N225 have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^N225 has higher volatility (8.55%) compared to EWJ (8.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWJ dropped -60.93% vs ^N225's -52.23%.

^N225 currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWJ and ^N225

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer