PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWJ vs. EWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWJ vs. EWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWJ achieves a 12.36% return, which is significantly lower than EWY's 80.20% return. Over the past 10 years, EWJ has underperformed EWY with an annualized return of 8.81%, while EWY has yielded a comparatively higher 14.92% annualized return.


EWJ

1D
-3.62%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
12.36%
6M
12.44%
1Y
28.52%
3Y*
16.28%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
8.81%

EWY

1D
-14.11%
1M
-7.89%
YTD
80.20%
6M
89.95%
1Y
173.18%
3Y*
42.02%
5Y*
15.71%
10Y*
14.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWJ vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWJ
iShares MSCI Japan ETF
12.36%25.84%7.03%20.29%-17.72%1.16%15.40%19.34%-14.10%24.27%
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
80.20%95.33%-20.48%19.05%-26.59%-7.58%39.43%7.97%-20.37%44.97%

Correlation

The correlation between EWJ and EWY is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2000

0.58

The correlation between EWJ and EWY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWJ vs. EWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWJ
EWY

Industrials

26.0%
20.4%

Technology

19.1%
52.4%

Financial Services

17.5%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
5.7%

Communication Services

7.9%
2.9%

Healthcare

6.3%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
1.7%

Basic Materials

3.0%
2.0%

Real Estate

2.3%

-

Utilities

1.1%
0.4%

Energy

1.1%
1.4%

Industrials

EWJ
26.0%
EWY
20.4%

Technology

EWJ
19.1%
EWY
52.4%

Financial Services

EWJ
17.5%
EWY
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EWJ
12.2%
EWY
5.7%

Communication Services

EWJ
7.9%
EWY
2.9%

Healthcare

EWJ
6.3%
EWY
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

EWJ
3.6%
EWY
1.7%

Basic Materials

EWJ
3.0%
EWY
2.0%

Real Estate

EWJ
2.3%
EWY

-

Utilities

EWJ
1.1%
EWY
0.4%

Energy

EWJ
1.1%
EWY
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWJ vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWJ
EWJ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

EWY
EWY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
EWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWY Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWJ vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWJEWYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.56

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

7.59

-5.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.31

27.69

-20.37

EWJ vs. EWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the EWY Sharpe Ratio of 3.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWJ and EWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWJEWYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

3.92

-2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.53

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.54

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.31

-0.20

Drawdowns

EWJ vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWJ drawdown since its inception was -60.93%, smaller than the maximum EWY drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWJ and EWY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWJEWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.93%

-74.14%

+13.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.59%

-23.08%

+9.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.68%

-27.36%

+12.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.14%

-48.55%

+15.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.14%

-49.73%

+16.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.62%

-19.16%

+15.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.73%

-20.12%

-1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

6.31%

-2.30%

Volatility

EWJ vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) is 5.08%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a volatility of 25.48%. This indicates that EWJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWJEWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

25.48%

-20.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.50%

40.93%

-25.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.84%

44.73%

-24.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.29%

29.57%

-11.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.31%

27.76%

-10.45%

EWJ vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EWY's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWJ vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison

EWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, more than EWY's 1.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWJ
iShares MSCI Japan ETF
4.03%4.52%2.34%2.03%1.23%2.08%1.04%2.03%1.71%1.25%1.95%1.27%
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
1.16%2.10%2.55%2.52%1.23%2.16%0.73%2.10%1.34%2.90%1.21%2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWJ and EWY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWY has higher volatility (25.48%) compared to EWJ (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWJ dropped -60.93% vs EWY's -74.14%.

On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 14.92% vs 8.81% for EWJ. On fees, EWJ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 14.92% return vs 8.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWJ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.

EWJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 1.16% for EWY.

EWJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while EWY is Asia Pacific Equities. EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index, while EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWJ and 0.59% for EWY.

EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWJ and EWY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer