PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. EEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. EEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 15.96% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 29.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VEA having a 10.27% annualized return and EEM not far behind at 10.06%.


VEA

1D
0.63%
1M
5.24%
YTD
15.96%
6M
19.86%
1Y
32.71%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
10.27%

EEM

1D
1.03%
1M
10.40%
YTD
29.41%
6M
32.25%
1Y
58.14%
3Y*
24.46%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
15.96%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
29.41%33.98%6.49%8.95%-20.56%-3.63%17.02%18.22%-15.31%37.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and EEM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.82

The correlation between VEA and EEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEA vs. EEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
EEM

Financial Services

23.3%
17.5%

Industrials

19.2%
6.2%

Technology

13.8%
43.6%

Healthcare

8.2%
2.5%

Basic Materials

7.5%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
2.7%

Energy

5.4%
3.3%

Communication Services

3.4%
5.7%

Utilities

3.3%
2.0%

Real Estate

2.7%
0.9%

Financial Services

VEA
23.3%
EEM
17.5%

Industrials

VEA
19.2%
EEM
6.2%

Technology

VEA
13.8%
EEM
43.6%

Healthcare

VEA
8.2%
EEM
2.5%

Basic Materials

VEA
7.5%
EEM
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.5%
EEM
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.6%
EEM
2.7%

Energy

VEA
5.4%
EEM
3.3%

Communication Services

VEA
3.4%
EEM
5.7%

Utilities

VEA
3.3%
EEM
2.0%

Real Estate

VEA
2.7%
EEM
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

EEM
EEM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEAEEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

2.93

-0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.89

3.75

-0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.53

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

4.39

-1.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.50

16.94

-5.43

VEA vs. EEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the EEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and EEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEAEEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.93

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.40

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.49

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.38

-0.14

Drawdowns

VEA vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, smaller than the maximum EEM drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and EEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEAEEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-66.43%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-13.52%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-17.29%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-37.71%

+8.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-39.82%

+4.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-16.02%

+2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

3.50%

-0.52%

Volatility

VEA vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) is 5.73%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a volatility of 8.36%. This indicates that VEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEAEEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

8.36%

-2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.30%

17.36%

-4.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.66%

19.93%

-4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

18.91%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

20.50%

-3.14%

VEA vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEA vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than EEM's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
1.72%2.22%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.59%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and EEM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEM has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to VEA (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs EEM's -66.43%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.27% vs 10.06% for EEM. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 5.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.27% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.72% for EEM.

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.72% for EEM.

EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and EEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer