VEA vs. EEM
VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while EEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEA returned 10.27%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for EEM. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for EEM.
Performance
VEA vs. EEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 15.96% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 29.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VEA having a 10.27% annualized return and EEM not far behind at 10.06%.
VEA
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 15.96%
- 6M
- 19.86%
- 1Y
- 32.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
EEM
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 10.40%
- YTD
- 29.41%
- 6M
- 32.25%
- 1Y
- 58.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
VEA vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 15.96% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 29.41% | 33.98% | 6.49% | 8.95% | -20.56% | -3.63% | 17.02% | 18.22% | -15.31% | 37.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEA and EEM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007 | 0.82 |
The correlation between VEA and EEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
VEA vs. EEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEA
EEM
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
VEA
EEM
Industrials
VEA
EEM
Technology
VEA
EEM
Healthcare
VEA
EEM
Basic Materials
VEA
EEM
Consumer Cyclical
VEA
EEM
Consumer Defensive
VEA
EEM
Energy
VEA
EEM
Communication Services
VEA
EEM
Utilities
VEA
EEM
Real Estate
VEA
EEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEA vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank
VEA
EEM
VEA vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VEA | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 2.93 | -0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.89 | 3.75 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.53 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 4.39 | -1.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.50 | 16.94 | -5.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VEA | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.93 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.40 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.49 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.38 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
VEA vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, smaller than the maximum EEM drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and EEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEA | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.68% | -66.43% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -13.52% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -17.29% | +3.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -37.71% | +8.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | -39.82% | +4.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.29% | -16.02% | +2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 3.50% | -0.52% |
Volatility
VEA vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) is 5.73%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a volatility of 8.36%. This indicates that VEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEA | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 8.36% | -2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.30% | 17.36% | -4.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.66% | 19.93% | -4.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 18.91% | -2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 20.50% | -3.14% |
VEA vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEA vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison
VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than EEM's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 1.72% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.59% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEA and EEM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEM has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to VEA (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs EEM's -66.43%.
On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.27% vs 10.06% for EEM. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 5.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.27% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.72% for EEM.
VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.72% for EEM.
EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEA and EEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer