PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDI vs. EFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDI vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus International Dividend ETF (VDI) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDI achieves a 14.23% return, which is significantly higher than EFAS's 13.06% return.


VDI

1D
0.72%
1M
3.02%
YTD
14.23%
6M
17.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EFAS

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.69%
YTD
13.06%
6M
17.18%
1Y
28.75%
3Y*
24.51%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDI vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VDI and EFAS is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.67

VDI vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VDI
EFAS

Financial Services

33.7%
30.1%

Industrials

15.4%
9.9%

Technology

9.1%
0.1%

Energy

9.0%
13.7%

Basic Materials

6.9%
1.8%

Utilities

6.0%
14.4%

Healthcare

5.9%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
1.9%

Real Estate

3.1%
11.3%

Communication Services

2.0%
8.6%

Financial Services

VDI
33.7%
EFAS
30.1%

Industrials

VDI
15.4%
EFAS
9.9%

Technology

VDI
9.1%
EFAS
0.1%

Energy

VDI
9.0%
EFAS
13.7%

Basic Materials

VDI
6.9%
EFAS
1.8%

Utilities

VDI
6.0%
EFAS
14.4%

Healthcare

VDI
5.9%
EFAS
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

VDI
4.6%
EFAS
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VDI
4.2%
EFAS
1.9%

Real Estate

VDI
3.1%
EFAS
11.3%

Communication Services

VDI
2.0%
EFAS
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDI vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDI

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDI vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus International Dividend ETF (VDI) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VDI vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDIEFASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.44

0.56

+1.88

Drawdowns

VDI vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDI drawdown since its inception was -10.40%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDI and EFAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDIEFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-44.38%

+33.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.92%

+2.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

-7.07%

+5.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

Volatility

VDI vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDIEFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

10.57%

+5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

15.59%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.17%

18.33%

-2.16%

VDI vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDI has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

VDI vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

VDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than EFAS's 4.72% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
4.72%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%
VDI
Virtus International Dividend ETF
0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDI and EFAS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDI is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDI is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for EFAS.

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.62% for VDI.

They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for VDI and 0.56% for EFAS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDI and EFAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer