PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VDI vs. AMZA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VDI vs. AMZA

Last updated Aug 1, 2026
Documentation

VDI (Virtus International Dividend ETF) and AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Virtus, while AMZA is a MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus. Both are actively managed. Their -0.06 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. VDI charges 0.39%/yr vs 2.01%/yr for AMZA.

Performance

VDI vs. AMZA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus International Dividend ETF (VDI) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDI achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly lower than AMZA's 30.46% return.

VDI

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.41%
6M
10.60%
YTD
17.52%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—

AMZA

1D
0.65%
1M
5.94%
6M
21.61%
YTD
30.46%
1Y
23.26%
3Y*
22.79%
5Y*
22.88%
10Y*
5.46%
ALL TIME*
-0.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

AMZA

InfraCap MLP ETF
$1.66M$1.65M$1.75M

VDI

Virtus International Dividend ETF
$85.19K$45.68K$18.02K

VDI vs. AMZA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
VDI
Virtus International Dividend ETF		17.52%3.29%
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF		30.46%-0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between VDI and AMZA is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

-0.06

VDI vs. AMZA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VDI
AMZA

Financial Services

35.7%

-

Industrials

12.9%
1.2%

Technology

10.2%

-

Energy

8.2%
99.8%

Utilities

6.1%
0.2%

Basic Materials

5.6%

-

Healthcare

4.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Communication Services

1.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%

-

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Financial Services

VDI
35.7%
AMZA

-

Industrials

VDI
12.9%
AMZA
1.2%

Technology

VDI
10.2%
AMZA

-

Energy

VDI
8.2%
AMZA
99.8%

Utilities

VDI
6.1%
AMZA
0.2%

Basic Materials

VDI
5.6%
AMZA

-

Healthcare

VDI
4.8%
AMZA

-

Consumer Defensive

VDI
4.4%
AMZA

-

Communication Services

VDI
1.9%
AMZA

-

Consumer Cyclical

VDI
1.8%
AMZA

-

Real Estate

VDI
1.3%
AMZA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Virtus International Dividend ETF

InfraCap MLP ETF

Often compared with VDI:
VDI vs. VUSVDI vs. KMIDVDI vs. SEIXVDI vs. VSHYVDI vs. ASMFVDI vs. NFLTVDI vs. VEU
Often compared with AMZA:
AMZA vs. ATMPAMZA vs. MLPBAMZA vs. UMIAMZA vs. GCCAMZA vs. CDUAFAMZA vs. EMOAMZA vs. DIV

Return for Risk

VDI vs. AMZA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
VDI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMZA
AMZA Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
AMZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VDI vs. AMZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus International Dividend ETF (VDI) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

VDIAMZADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

1.20

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

1.74

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.21

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

1.85

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

4.51

—

VDI vs. AMZA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VDI vs. AMZA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDI drawdown since its inception was -10.40%, smaller than the maximum AMZA drawdown of -91.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDI and AMZA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VDIAMZADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-91.46%

+81.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-11.84%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-18.56%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-25.15%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-86.84%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-4.13%

+3.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-44.51%

+42.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

5.02%

—

Volatility

VDI vs. AMZA - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VDIAMZADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

5.43%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

14.17%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.30%

18.20%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

25.27%

-8.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.30%

37.14%

-20.84%

VDI vs. AMZA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDI has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZA's 2.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

VDI vs. AMZA - Dividend Comparison

VDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than AMZA's 7.83% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF		7.83%8.81%7.29%9.40%7.65%10.24%22.13%19.47%34.46%24.16%18.36%18.21%
VDI
Virtus International Dividend ETF		2.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

VDI and AMZA have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDI is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDI is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.

AMZA has the higher dividend yield at 7.83%, compared with 2.28% for VDI.

VDI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AMZA is MLPs. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for VDI and 2.01% for AMZA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDI and AMZA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer