PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDC vs. TMDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDC vs. TMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly higher than TMDV's 4.53% return.


VDC

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.32%
YTD
5.75%
6M
4.31%
1Y
1.24%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
7.59%

TMDV

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.05%
YTD
4.53%
6M
4.29%
1Y
5.96%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDC vs. TMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
5.75%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%4.51%
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
4.53%2.91%2.64%2.25%-5.10%23.45%4.82%3.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VDC and TMDV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

0.76

The correlation between VDC and TMDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VDC vs. TMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VDC
TMDV

Consumer Defensive

97.5%
23.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
5.8%

Industrials

0.3%
15.9%

Basic Materials

0.3%
11.7%

Healthcare

0.0%
5.6%

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

3.0%

Financial Services

-

16.0%

Real Estate

-

4.6%

Technology

-

1.5%

Utilities

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

VDC
97.5%
TMDV
23.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VDC
1.8%
TMDV
5.8%

Industrials

VDC
0.3%
TMDV
15.9%

Basic Materials

VDC
0.3%
TMDV
11.7%

Healthcare

VDC
0.0%
TMDV
5.6%

Communication Services

VDC

-

TMDV

-

Energy

VDC

-

TMDV
3.0%

Financial Services

VDC

-

TMDV
16.0%

Real Estate

VDC

-

TMDV
4.6%

Technology

VDC

-

TMDV
1.5%

Utilities

VDC

-

TMDV
12.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDC vs. TMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

TMDV
TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDC vs. TMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDCTMDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.09

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

0.61

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.28

1.50

-1.22

VDC vs. TMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the TMDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDC and TMDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDCTMDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

0.50

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.17

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.30

+0.36

Drawdowns

VDC vs. TMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, roughly equal to the maximum TMDV drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and TMDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDCTMDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.24%

-33.42%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-9.82%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.78%

-16.02%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.55%

-17.11%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.52%

-6.56%

-1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-5.43%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

3.99%

+0.50%

Volatility

VDC vs. TMDV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) at 2.97%. This indicates that VDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDCTMDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

2.97%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

8.53%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

12.10%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.13%

14.43%

-1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

18.64%

-4.00%

VDC vs. TMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than TMDV's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VDC vs. TMDV - Dividend Comparison

VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than TMDV's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
2.62%2.65%2.70%2.45%2.46%2.14%2.28%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.17%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDC and TMDV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VDC has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to TMDV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs TMDV's -33.42%.

On 5-year performance, VDC leads with 6.06% vs 2.41% for TMDV. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, TMDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VDC has performed better with a 6.06% return vs 2.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TMDV.

TMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 2.17% for VDC.

VDC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while TMDV is Mid Cap Value Equities. VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while TMDV tracks Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDC and 0.35% for TMDV.

TMDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDC and TMDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer