PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
VDC vs. XLP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between VDC and XLP is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

VDC vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

500.00%520.00%540.00%560.00%580.00%600.00%620.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
569.68%
505.63%
VDC
XLP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VDC:

1.24

XLP:

0.99

Sortino Ratio

VDC:

1.81

XLP:

1.46

Omega Ratio

VDC:

1.21

XLP:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

VDC:

1.67

XLP:

1.17

Martin Ratio

VDC:

5.53

XLP:

3.89

Ulcer Index

VDC:

2.15%

XLP:

2.51%

Daily Std Dev

VDC:

9.62%

XLP:

9.89%

Max Drawdown

VDC:

-34.24%

XLP:

-35.89%

Current Drawdown

VDC:

-5.83%

XLP:

-7.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly higher than XLP's -1.74% return. Over the past 10 years, VDC has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 7.83%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.39% annualized return.


VDC

YTD

-0.92%

1M

-2.57%

6M

2.45%

1Y

11.97%

5Y*

7.81%

10Y*

7.83%

XLP

YTD

-1.74%

1M

-3.00%

6M

0.19%

1Y

9.90%

5Y*

6.69%

10Y*

7.39%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VDC vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDC has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XLP's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


XLP
Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund
Expense ratio chart for XLP: current value at 0.13% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.13%
Expense ratio chart for VDC: current value at 0.10% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.10%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

VDC vs. XLP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VDC is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VDC is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VDC is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VDC is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VDC is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VDC is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

XLP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLP is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLP is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLP is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLP is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLP is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLP is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VDC vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VDC, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.240.99
The chart of Sortino ratio for VDC, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.811.46
The chart of Omega ratio for VDC, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market1.002.003.001.211.17
The chart of Calmar ratio for VDC, currently valued at 1.67, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.671.17
The chart of Martin ratio for VDC, currently valued at 5.53, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.005.533.89
VDC
XLP

The current VDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDC and XLP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.24
0.99
VDC
XLP

Dividends

VDC vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than XLP's 2.82% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.35%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%1.93%
XLP
Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund
2.82%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.53%2.40%

Drawdowns

VDC vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, roughly equal to the maximum XLP drawdown of -35.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and XLP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-5.83%
-7.14%
VDC
XLP

Volatility

VDC vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) have volatilities of 3.14% and 3.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.14%
3.02%
VDC
XLP
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab