VDC vs. IGF

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VDC returned 8.03%/yr vs 8.67%/yr for IGF. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VDC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.

Performance

VDC vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 9.68% return. Over the past 10 years, VDC has underperformed IGF with an annualized return of 8.03%, while IGF has yielded a comparatively higher 8.67% annualized return.

VDC

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 10.55%
• 6M: 8.59%
• 1Y: 8.56%
• 3Y*: 9.05%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: 8.03%

IGF

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 1.89%
• YTD: 9.68%
• 6M: 10.24%
• 1Y: 17.04%
• 3Y*: 16.28%
• 5Y*: 10.22%
• 10Y*: 8.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDC vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF	10.55%	2.17%	13.30%	2.38%	-1.79%	17.64%	10.86%	26.11%	-7.79%	11.85%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	9.68%	21.31%	14.81%	6.14%	-1.26%	11.57%	-6.50%	25.82%	-9.95%	19.31%

Correlation

The correlation between VDC and IGF is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2007	0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between VDC and IGF has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VDC vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VDC	IGF
Consumer Defensive	97.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.8%	-
Industrials	0.3%	40.6%
Basic Materials	0.3%	-
Healthcare	0.0%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	19.6%
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	39.7%

Return for Risk

VDC vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDC

VDC Risk / Return Rank: 19
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 18
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 18

IGF

IGF Risk / Return Rank: 54
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 49
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDC vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VDC	IGF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.58	1.55	-0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	2.22	-1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.27	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.79	2.78	-1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.60	8.03	-6.43

VDC vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDC and IGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VDC vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and IGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	VDC	IGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.24%	-58.33%	+24.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.28%	-5.87%	-3.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.78%	-14.28%	+2.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.55%	-20.83%	+4.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.31%	-42.11%	+16.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.37%	-2.98%	-1.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.73%	-11.86%	+8.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.57%	2.04%	+2.53%

Volatility

VDC vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.85%. This indicates that VDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VDC	IGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.62%	3.85%	+0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.02%	8.73%	+1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.57%	10.58%	+1.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.17%	14.00%	-0.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.66%	16.83%	-2.17%

VDC vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

VDC vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than IGF's 2.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	2.94%	3.23%	3.21%	3.36%	2.67%	2.42%	2.33%	3.27%	3.52%	2.95%	2.98%	3.25%
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF	2.08%	2.26%	2.33%	2.65%	2.37%	2.14%	2.50%	2.44%	2.78%	2.52%	2.39%	2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VDC and IGF in my portfolio?

VDC and IGF have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VDC or IGF?

VDC has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to IGF (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs IGF's -58.33%.

Which ETF is better, VDC or IGF?

On 10-year performance, IGF leads with 8.67% vs 8.03% for VDC. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VDC or IGF?

Over the 10-year period, IGF has performed better with a 8.67% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VDC or IGF?

VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VDC or IGF?

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 2.08% for VDC.

What is the main difference between VDC and IGF?

VDC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while IGF is Industrials Equities. VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDC and 0.39% for IGF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.