PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDC vs. FLKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDC vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 67.20% return.


VDC

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.01%
6M
3.84%
YTD
9.80%
1Y
7.27%
3Y*
7.55%
5Y*
7.07%
10Y*
7.53%
ALL TIME*
9.43%

FLKR

1D
0.49%
1M
-25.25%
6M
45.78%
YTD
67.20%
1Y
125.99%
3Y*
38.49%
5Y*
14.68%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDC vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
9.80%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%7.84%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
67.20%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VDC and FLKR is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.25

The correlation between VDC and FLKR shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VDC vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VDC
FLKR

Consumer Defensive

96.7%
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

1.2%
7.2%

Industrials

0.6%
15.6%

Basic Materials

0.6%
2.8%

Technology

0.5%
53.7%

Healthcare

0.0%
3.3%

Communication Services

-

1.8%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

12.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.4%

Consumer Defensive

VDC
96.7%
FLKR
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VDC
1.2%
FLKR
7.2%

Industrials

VDC
0.6%
FLKR
15.6%

Basic Materials

VDC
0.6%
FLKR
2.8%

Technology

VDC
0.5%
FLKR
53.7%

Healthcare

VDC
0.0%
FLKR
3.3%

Communication Services

VDC

-

FLKR
1.8%

Energy

VDC

-

FLKR
0.6%

Financial Services

VDC

-

FLKR
12.3%

Real Estate

VDC

-

FLKR

-

Utilities

VDC

-

FLKR
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDC vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDC vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VDCFLKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.40

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

4.84

-4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.50

15.43

-13.94

VDC vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDC and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VDC vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and FLKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDCFLKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.24%

-50.06%

+15.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-26.19%

+16.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.78%

-26.39%

+14.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.55%

-47.97%

+31.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.02%

-25.83%

+20.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-21.94%

+18.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.87%

8.20%

-3.33%

Volatility

VDC vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) is 5.38%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 22.88%. This indicates that VDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDCFLKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

22.88%

-17.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.86%

48.04%

-37.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

51.00%

-37.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.35%

31.34%

-17.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.73%

29.32%

-14.59%

VDC vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VDC and FLKR have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VDC vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than FLKR's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
2.76%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%0.00%0.00%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.09%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDC and FLKR have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (22.88%) compared to VDC (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 14.68% vs 7.07% for VDC. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 14.68% return vs 7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VDC and FLKR have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 2.09% for VDC.

VDC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while FLKR is South Korea Equities. VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Franklin Templeton.

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDC and FLKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer