VCRB vs. VGT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VCRB (Vanguard Core Bond ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VCRB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Vanguard, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. VCRB is actively managed, while VGT is passively managed. Over the past year, VCRB returned 5.60% vs 60.15% for VGT. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VCRB charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.

Performance

VCRB vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCRB achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return.

VCRB

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 0.47%
• 6M: 0.34%
• 1Y: 5.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VGT

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: 18.07%
• YTD: 31.64%
• 6M: 30.51%
• 1Y: 60.15%
• 3Y*: 33.48%
• 5Y*: 22.23%
• 10Y*: 25.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCRB vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VCRB Vanguard Core Bond ETF	0.47%	7.56%	2.21%	0.65%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	31.64%	21.77%	29.30%	1.02%

Correlation

The correlation between VCRB and VGT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	0.12

VCRB vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VCRB	VGT
Technology	0.1%	98.5%
Energy	0.0%	0.3%
Real Estate	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Communication Services	-	0.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	0.0%
Industrials	-	0.4%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

VCRB vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCRB

VCRB Risk / Return Rank: 42
VCRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
VCRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
VCRB Omega Ratio Rank: 41
VCRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
VCRB Martin Ratio Rank: 39

VGT

VGT Risk / Return Rank: 76
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCRB vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VCRB	VGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.95	-1.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	3.63	-1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.47	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	3.69	-1.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.38	11.77	-5.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VCRB vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCRB and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VCRB	VGT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	2.95	-1.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	0.68	+0.25

Drawdowns

VCRB vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCRB drawdown since its inception was -4.59%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCRB and VGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	VCRB	VGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.59%	-54.63%	+50.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.63%	-16.40%	+13.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.23%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.07%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.40%	-1.48%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.16%	-7.95%	+6.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	5.13%	-4.25%

Volatility

VCRB vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) is 1.18%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that VCRB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VCRB	VGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.18%	6.39%	-5.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.60%	16.07%	-13.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.69%	20.57%	-16.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.74%	25.18%	-20.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.74%	24.60%	-19.86%

VCRB vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCRB has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VCRB vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

VCRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VCRB Vanguard Core Bond ETF	4.60%	4.55%	4.22%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	0.31%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.64%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VCRB and VGT in my portfolio?

VCRB and VGT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VCRB or VGT?

VGT has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to VCRB (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCRB dropped -4.59% vs VGT's -54.63%.

Which ETF is better, VCRB or VGT?

On 1-year performance, VGT leads with 60.15% vs 5.60% for VCRB. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VCRB has been the lower-risk option at 1.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VCRB or VGT?

Over the 1-year period, VGT has performed better with a 60.15% return vs 5.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VCRB or VGT?

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VCRB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VCRB or VGT?

VCRB has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.

What is the main difference between VCRB and VGT?

VCRB is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while VGT is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VCRB and 0.09% for VGT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.