PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCRB vs. CGCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCRB vs. CGCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) and Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCRB achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than CGCB's 0.05% return.


VCRB

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.34%
1Y
5.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CGCB

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.05%
6M
0.01%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCRB vs. CGCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VCRB
Vanguard Core Bond ETF
0.47%7.56%2.21%0.65%
CGCB
Capital Group Core Bond ETF
0.05%7.29%1.44%0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between VCRB and CGCB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023

0.94

The correlation between VCRB and CGCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCRB vs. CGCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCRB
VCRB Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VCRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCRB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VCRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

CGCB
CGCB Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCRB vs. CGCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) and Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCRBCGCBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

1.29

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.27

1.92

+0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.22

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

1.71

+0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.38

5.16

+1.22

VCRB vs. CGCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the CGCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCRB and CGCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCRBCGCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.29

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

1.08

-0.15

Drawdowns

VCRB vs. CGCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCRB drawdown since its inception was -4.59%, smaller than the maximum CGCB drawdown of -5.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCRB and CGCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCRBCGCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-5.17%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.63%

-2.98%

+0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-1.83%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.16%

-1.34%

+0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.98%

-0.10%

Volatility

VCRB vs. CGCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) is 1.18%, while Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that VCRB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCRBCGCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

1.32%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

2.80%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

3.94%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.74%

5.39%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.74%

5.39%

-0.65%

VCRB vs. CGCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCRB has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CGCB's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCRB vs. CGCB - Dividend Comparison

VCRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than CGCB's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CGCB
Capital Group Core Bond ETF
4.22%4.22%3.99%0.95%
VCRB
Vanguard Core Bond ETF
4.60%4.55%4.22%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VCRB and CGCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CGCB has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to VCRB (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCRB dropped -4.59% vs CGCB's -5.17%.

On 1-year performance, VCRB leads with 5.60% vs 5.06% for CGCB. On fees, VCRB is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VCRB has been the lower-risk option at 1.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VCRB has performed better with a 5.60% return vs 5.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCRB is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for CGCB.

VCRB has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 4.22% for CGCB.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VCRB and 0.27% for CGCB.

VCRB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCRB and CGCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer