PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCRB vs. VPLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCRB vs. VPLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCRB achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than VPLS's 0.90% return.


VCRB

1D
0.10%
1M
0.72%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.80%
1Y
4.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VPLS

1D
0.10%
1M
0.72%
YTD
0.90%
6M
1.01%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCRB vs. VPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VCRB
Vanguard Core Bond ETF
0.73%7.56%2.21%0.95%
VPLS
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF
0.90%7.86%2.72%1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between VCRB and VPLS is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023

0.97

The correlation between VCRB and VPLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCRB vs. VPLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCRB
VCRB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VCRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCRB Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VCRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

VPLS
VPLS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VPLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VPLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPLS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCRB vs. VPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VCRBVPLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.90

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.16

5.92

-0.76

VCRB vs. VPLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the VPLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCRB and VPLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VCRB vs. VPLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCRB drawdown since its inception was -4.59%, which is greater than VPLS's maximum drawdown of -4.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCRB and VPLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCRBVPLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-4.17%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.63%

-2.72%

+0.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-0.96%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.16%

-1.01%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.87%

+0.06%

Volatility

VCRB vs. VPLS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) have volatilities of 0.94% and 0.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCRBVPLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

0.96%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

2.75%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.61%

3.60%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.72%

4.59%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.72%

4.59%

+0.13%

VCRB vs. VPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCRB has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VPLS's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCRB vs. VPLS - Dividend Comparison

VCRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, less than VPLS's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
VCRB
Vanguard Core Bond ETF
4.59%4.55%4.22%0.16%
VPLS
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF
4.75%4.78%4.52%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VCRB and VPLS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VPLS has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to VCRB (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCRB dropped -4.59% vs VPLS's -4.17%.

On 1-year performance, VPLS leads with 5.14% vs 4.77% for VCRB. On fees, VCRB is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VPLS has performed better with a 5.14% return vs 4.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCRB is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for VPLS.

VPLS has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 4.59% for VCRB.

VCRB is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while VPLS is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VCRB and 0.20% for VPLS.

VPLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCRB and VPLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer