PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBK vs. PRFZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBK vs. PRFZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBK achieves a 15.49% return, which is significantly lower than PRFZ's 19.43% return. Over the past 10 years, VBK has underperformed PRFZ with an annualized return of 11.08%, while PRFZ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.70% annualized return.


VBK

1D
1.50%
1M
-2.25%
6M
8.68%
YTD
15.49%
1Y
24.51%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
4.81%
10Y*
11.08%
ALL TIME*
9.87%

PRFZ

1D
1.26%
1M
2.57%
6M
13.47%
YTD
19.43%
1Y
31.60%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
11.70%
ALL TIME*
10.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBK vs. PRFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
15.49%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%35.44%32.75%-5.70%21.87%
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
19.43%11.26%12.68%20.21%-16.29%28.26%11.84%21.91%-11.43%13.82%

Correlation

The correlation between VBK and PRFZ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2006

0.93

The correlation between VBK and PRFZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

VBK vs. PRFZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBK
PRFZ

Technology

27.1%
19.5%

Industrials

23.4%
16.1%

Healthcare

17.9%
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
11.2%

Financial Services

5.7%
13.6%

Real Estate

3.7%
6.9%

Communication Services

3.6%
2.9%

Energy

3.4%
4.4%

Basic Materials

3.1%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
3.0%

Utilities

1.1%
1.3%

Technology

VBK
27.1%
PRFZ
19.5%

Industrials

VBK
23.4%
PRFZ
16.1%

Healthcare

VBK
17.9%
PRFZ
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VBK
8.9%
PRFZ
11.2%

Financial Services

VBK
5.7%
PRFZ
13.6%

Real Estate

VBK
3.7%
PRFZ
6.9%

Communication Services

VBK
3.6%
PRFZ
2.9%

Energy

VBK
3.4%
PRFZ
4.4%

Basic Materials

VBK
3.1%
PRFZ
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

VBK
2.0%
PRFZ
3.0%

Utilities

VBK
1.1%
PRFZ
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBK vs. PRFZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

PRFZ
PRFZ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PRFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBK vs. PRFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBKPRFZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.30

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

3.06

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.71

10.42

-2.70

VBK vs. PRFZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBK Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the PRFZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBK and PRFZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBK vs. PRFZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBK drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, smaller than the maximum PRFZ drawdown of -62.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBK and PRFZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBKPRFZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.68%

-62.41%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-10.38%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.54%

-26.54%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.39%

-26.58%

-11.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

-44.28%

+5.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.80%

-2.13%

-2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.11%

-9.37%

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

3.04%

+0.15%

Volatility

VBK vs. PRFZ - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) at 3.74%. This indicates that VBK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRFZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBKPRFZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

3.74%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.76%

13.05%

+2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.19%

18.09%

+2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.63%

21.24%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.89%

22.38%

+0.51%

VBK vs. PRFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PRFZ's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBK vs. PRFZ - Dividend Comparison

VBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than PRFZ's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
0.79%0.82%1.45%1.42%1.33%0.93%0.91%1.29%1.37%0.97%1.31%1.39%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.44%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VBK and PRFZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBK has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to PRFZ (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBK dropped -58.68% vs PRFZ's -62.41%.

On 10-year performance, PRFZ leads with 11.70% vs 11.08% for VBK. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, PRFZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PRFZ has performed better with a 11.70% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PRFZ.

PRFZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.44% for VBK.

VBK is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while PRFZ is Small Cap Blend Equities. VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index, while PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBK and 0.39% for PRFZ.

PRFZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBK and PRFZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer