PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBK vs. ONEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBK vs. ONEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBK achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly higher than ONEV's 10.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VBK having a 10.92% annualized return and ONEV not far ahead at 11.26%.


VBK

1D
-0.45%
1M
-3.69%
6M
5.77%
YTD
13.79%
1Y
21.80%
3Y*
13.93%
5Y*
4.38%
10Y*
10.92%
ALL TIME*
9.80%

ONEV

1D
-0.49%
1M
3.59%
6M
5.87%
YTD
10.50%
1Y
14.69%
3Y*
11.37%
5Y*
8.82%
10Y*
11.26%
ALL TIME*
11.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBK vs. ONEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
13.79%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%35.44%32.75%-5.70%21.87%
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
10.50%8.14%11.76%13.28%-8.15%29.19%6.66%30.66%-5.30%18.11%

Correlation

The correlation between VBK and ONEV is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

0.72

The correlation between VBK and ONEV shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VBK vs. ONEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBK
ONEV

Technology

27.1%
8.3%

Industrials

23.4%
17.7%

Healthcare

17.9%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
11.3%

Financial Services

5.7%
17.0%

Real Estate

3.7%
8.3%

Communication Services

3.6%
2.7%

Energy

3.4%
2.3%

Basic Materials

3.1%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
9.1%

Utilities

1.1%
8.2%

Technology

VBK
27.1%
ONEV
8.3%

Industrials

VBK
23.4%
ONEV
17.7%

Healthcare

VBK
17.9%
ONEV
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VBK
8.9%
ONEV
11.3%

Financial Services

VBK
5.7%
ONEV
17.0%

Real Estate

VBK
3.7%
ONEV
8.3%

Communication Services

VBK
3.6%
ONEV
2.7%

Energy

VBK
3.4%
ONEV
2.3%

Basic Materials

VBK
3.1%
ONEV
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

VBK
2.0%
ONEV
9.1%

Utilities

VBK
1.1%
ONEV
8.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBK vs. ONEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEV
ONEV Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ONEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEV Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBK vs. ONEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBKONEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.23

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.90

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.89

6.50

+0.39

VBK vs. ONEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBK Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the ONEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBK and ONEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBK vs. ONEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBK drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than ONEV's maximum drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBK and ONEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBKONEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.68%

-39.72%

-18.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-7.75%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.54%

-14.81%

-12.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.39%

-18.52%

-19.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

-39.72%

+1.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.20%

-0.94%

-5.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.11%

-3.86%

-6.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.27%

+0.90%

Volatility

VBK vs. ONEV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) at 3.53%. This indicates that VBK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBKONEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

3.53%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.69%

8.20%

+7.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.18%

11.43%

+8.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.63%

14.54%

+9.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.89%

17.01%

+5.88%

VBK vs. ONEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ONEV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBK vs. ONEV - Dividend Comparison

VBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than ONEV's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
1.83%1.81%1.88%1.79%1.80%1.44%1.87%2.07%2.14%6.91%3.73%0.21%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.45%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBK and ONEV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBK has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to ONEV (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBK dropped -58.68% vs ONEV's -39.72%.

On 10-year performance, ONEV leads with 11.26% vs 10.92% for VBK. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, ONEV has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEV has performed better with a 11.26% return vs 10.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ONEV.

ONEV has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.45% for VBK.

VBK is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while ONEV is Volatility Hedged Equity. VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index, while ONEV tracks Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBK and 0.20% for ONEV.

ONEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBK and ONEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer