VBCC vs. VYM
VBCC (Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBCC is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2029 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VBCC charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
VBCC vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCC
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VYM
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 10.90%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 25.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
VBCC vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCC Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.85% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 7.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCC and VYM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCC vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
VBCC
VYM
VBCC vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCC) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBCC | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.05 | 0.51 | +1.54 |
Drawdowns
VBCC vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCC drawdown since its inception was -0.79%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCC and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCC | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -56.98% | +56.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -1.82% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -7.19% | +6.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.78% | — |
Volatility
VBCC vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCC | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21% | 10.35% | -8.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.21% | 13.97% | -11.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.21% | 16.34% | -14.13% |
VBCC vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCC vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
VBCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than VYM's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBCC Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.22% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBCC and VYM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VBCC.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.45% for VBCC.
VBCC is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VYM is Dividend. VBCC tracks ICE 2029 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCC and 0.04% for VYM.
Find the right allocation for VBCC and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer