VBCC vs. VT
VBCC (Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBCC is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2029 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VBCC charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
VBCC vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCC
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
VT
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 23.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.19%
- 5Y*
- 10.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $576.39K | $637.25K | $642.30K | |
| $425.08M | $369.63M | $481.55M |
VBCC vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCC Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.01% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCC and VT is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCC vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
VBCC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VT
VBCC vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCC) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBCC | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.29 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.54 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBCC vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCC drawdown since its inception was -0.79%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCC and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCC | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -50.27% | +49.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -1.84% | +1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.23% | -6.97% | +6.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.32% | — |
Volatility
VBCC vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCC | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19% | 13.96% | -11.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.19% | 16.22% | -14.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.19% | 17.18% | -14.99% |
VBCC vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCC vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
VBCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBCC Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBCC and VT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VBCC.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.79% for VBCC.
VBCC is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VT is Global Equities. VBCC tracks ICE 2029 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCC and 0.06% for VT.
Find the right allocation for VBCC and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer