PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBCA vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBCA vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Maturity 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCA) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VBCA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VUG

1D
-1.23%
1M
6.22%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBCA vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VBCA and VUG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026

0.51

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBCA vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBCA

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBCA vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCA) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VBCA vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBCAVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.67

0.62

+5.05

Drawdowns

VBCA vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBCA drawdown since its inception was -0.19%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCA and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBCAVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.19%

-50.68%

+50.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.51%

+1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-7.09%

+7.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.71%

Volatility

VBCA vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBCAVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97%

15.84%

-14.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.97%

22.22%

-21.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.97%

21.44%

-20.47%

VBCA vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBCA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBCA vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

VBCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBCA
Vanguard Target Maturity 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBCA and VUG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VBCA.

VBCA has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.

VBCA is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VBCA tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCA and 0.03% for VUG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBCA and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer