PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBCA vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBCA vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Maturity 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCA) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VBCA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BND

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.12%
1Y
5.11%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
1.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBCA vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VBCA and BND is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026

0.79

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBCA vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBCA

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBCA vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCA) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VBCA vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBCABNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.67

0.59

+5.08

Drawdowns

VBCA vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBCA drawdown since its inception was -0.19%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCA and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBCABNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.19%

-18.58%

+18.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.37%

+2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-3.06%

+3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

Volatility

VBCA vs. BND - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBCABNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97%

3.78%

-2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.97%

6.02%

-5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.97%

5.53%

-4.56%

VBCA vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBCA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBCA vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

VBCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than BND's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.97%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
VBCA
Vanguard Target Maturity 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBCA and BND have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VBCA.

BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.42% for VBCA.

VBCA is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BND is Total Bond Market. VBCA tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCA and 0.03% for BND.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBCA and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer