PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VB vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VB vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 15.68% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 16.69% return. Over the past 10 years, VB has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 11.79%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 11.06% annualized return.


VB

1D
0.26%
1M
2.83%
YTD
15.68%
6M
13.00%
1Y
30.17%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
11.79%

VEA

1D
0.11%
1M
3.28%
YTD
16.69%
6M
17.33%
1Y
35.42%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VB vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
15.68%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
16.69%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VB and VEA is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007

0.78

The correlation between VB and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

VB vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VB
VEA

Industrials

20.6%
17.5%

Technology

19.4%
16.6%

Financial Services

12.3%
22.3%

Healthcare

11.3%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
7.4%

Real Estate

7.5%
2.5%

Basic Materials

4.7%
7.5%

Energy

4.2%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
5.5%

Utilities

3.1%
3.0%

Communication Services

3.0%
3.2%

Industrials

VB
20.6%
VEA
17.5%

Technology

VB
19.4%
VEA
16.6%

Financial Services

VB
12.3%
VEA
22.3%

Healthcare

VB
11.3%
VEA
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VB
10.9%
VEA
7.4%

Real Estate

VB
7.5%
VEA
2.5%

Basic Materials

VB
4.7%
VEA
7.5%

Energy

VB
4.2%
VEA
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

VB
3.1%
VEA
5.5%

Utilities

VB
3.1%
VEA
3.0%

Communication Services

VB
3.0%
VEA
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VB vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VB vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

3.06

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.38

11.80

+0.58

VB vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VB Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VB and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VB vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, roughly equal to the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.56%

-60.68%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-11.63%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.36%

-13.45%

-11.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-29.71%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

-35.73%

-6.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

0.00%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-13.26%

+4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

3.01%

-0.57%

Volatility

VB vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) is 4.92%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that VB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

6.32%

-1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.21%

14.39%

-2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.66%

16.52%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.78%

16.71%

+4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.45%

17.38%

+4.07%

VB vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VB vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than VEA's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.18%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.50%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VB and VEA have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to VB (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.79% vs 11.06% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.79% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VB.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 1.18% for VB.

VB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VB and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VB and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer