PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VB vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VB vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 13.84% return. Over the past 10 years, VB has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 11.08%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.05% annualized return.


VB

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.73%
6M
10.09%
YTD
15.19%
1Y
25.91%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
11.08%
ALL TIME*
9.88%

VEA

1D
-0.66%
1M
-0.27%
6M
7.42%
YTD
13.84%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
10.05%
ALL TIME*
5.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$121.48M$119.40M$165.11M
$674.44M$796.70M$806.62M

VB vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
15.19%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
13.84%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VB and VEA is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007

0.77

The correlation between VB and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

VB vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VB
VEA

Industrials

19.9%
17.9%

Technology

17.9%
18.4%

Healthcare

12.5%
7.9%

Financial Services

12.4%
23.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
7.3%

Real Estate

7.9%
2.5%

Basic Materials

4.4%
6.9%

Energy

3.9%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
5.3%

Utilities

3.3%
3.1%

Communication Services

2.9%
3.2%

Industrials

VB
19.9%
VEA
17.9%

Technology

VB
17.9%
VEA
18.4%

Healthcare

VB
12.5%
VEA
7.9%

Financial Services

VB
12.4%
VEA
23.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VB
11.6%
VEA
7.3%

Real Estate

VB
7.9%
VEA
2.5%

Basic Materials

VB
4.4%
VEA
6.9%

Energy

VB
3.9%
VEA
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

VB
3.3%
VEA
5.3%

Utilities

VB
3.3%
VEA
3.1%

Communication Services

VB
2.9%
VEA
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VB vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VB vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.53

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.73

9.44

+0.29

VB vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VB Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VB and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VB vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, roughly equal to the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.56%

-60.68%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-11.63%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.36%

-13.45%

-11.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-29.71%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

-35.73%

-6.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-2.45%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.39%

-13.20%

+4.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

3.10%

-0.64%

Volatility

VB vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) is 3.36%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that VB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

5.40%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.01%

15.40%

-3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.47%

17.25%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.69%

16.84%

+3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.37%

17.21%

+4.16%

VB vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VB and VEA have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VB vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than VEA's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.22%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.57%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VB and VEA have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to VB (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.08% vs 10.05% for VEA. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB and VEA have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 1.22% for VB.

VB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VB and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer