PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VB vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VB vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 14.16% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VB having a 11.30% annualized return and USL not far behind at 10.91%.


VB

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.52%
YTD
14.16%
6M
14.12%
1Y
28.82%
3Y*
17.05%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
11.30%

USL

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
63.07%
6M
59.66%
1Y
57.86%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VB vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
14.16%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
63.07%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-14.15%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between VB and USL is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2007

0.31

The correlation between VB and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VB vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VB
USL

Industrials

20.8%

-

Technology

17.2%

-

Financial Services

12.6%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%

-

Healthcare

11.1%

-

Real Estate

7.6%

-

Basic Materials

4.8%

-

Energy

4.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.4%

-

Utilities

3.3%

-

Communication Services

3.1%

-

Industrials

VB
20.8%
USL

-

Technology

VB
17.2%
USL

-

Financial Services

VB
12.6%
USL
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VB
11.3%
USL

-

Healthcare

VB
11.1%
USL

-

Real Estate

VB
7.6%
USL

-

Basic Materials

VB
4.8%
USL

-

Energy

VB
4.7%
USL

-

Consumer Defensive

VB
3.4%
USL

-

Utilities

VB
3.3%
USL

-

Communication Services

VB
3.1%
USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VB vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VB vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.34

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

3.47

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.87

7.02

+4.85

VB vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VB Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VB and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

2.04

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.58

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.34

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.01

+0.43

Drawdowns

VB vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.56%

-89.06%

+29.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-16.76%

+7.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.36%

-23.33%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-33.82%

+5.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

-66.02%

+23.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-38.16%

+37.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-61.46%

+53.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

8.27%

-5.84%

Volatility

VB vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) is 4.42%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that VB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

10.53%

-6.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

23.33%

-11.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.28%

28.54%

-12.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.74%

30.08%

-9.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.42%

32.35%

-10.93%

VB vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

VB vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.19%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


VB and USL have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to VB (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.30% vs 10.91% for USL. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.30% return vs 10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

VB has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

VB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VB and 0.88% for USL.

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VB and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer