VAVX vs. FLTR
VAVX (VanEck Avalanche ETF) and FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VAVX is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the MarketVector Avalanche Benchmark Rate, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VAVX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.
Performance
VAVX vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VAVX
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- -17.23%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 2.48%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.50%
VAVX vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VAVX VanEck Avalanche ETF | -32.60% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between VAVX and FLTR is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VAVX vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
VAVX
FLTR
VAVX vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Avalanche ETF (VAVX) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VAVX | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 6.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.02 | 0.53 | -1.55 |
Drawdowns
VAVX vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAVX drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAVX and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VAVX | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -17.84% | -17.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -3.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.95% | 0.00% | -34.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.01% | -0.67% | -21.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility
VAVX vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VAVX | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.80% | 0.79% | +65.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.80% | 2.13% | +63.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.80% | 5.00% | +60.80% |
VAVX vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VAVX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VAVX vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
VAVX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.73% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
VAVX VanEck Avalanche ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VAVX and FLTR have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for VAVX.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 0.00% for VAVX.
VAVX is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. VAVX tracks MarketVector Avalanche Benchmark Rate, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for VAVX and 0.14% for FLTR.
Find the right allocation for VAVX and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer