PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAMO vs. GAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAMO vs. GAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAMO achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than GAA's 9.39% return. Over the past 10 years, VAMO has underperformed GAA with an annualized return of 5.64%, while GAA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.72% annualized return.


VAMO

1D
0.04%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
3.15%
6M
4.57%
1Y
18.13%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
5.64%

GAA

1D
-0.66%
1M
1.35%
YTD
9.39%
6M
11.23%
1Y
22.62%
3Y*
14.43%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
7.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAMO vs. GAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VAMO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
3.15%16.51%6.11%5.58%8.55%32.16%-4.92%-4.63%-11.43%3.82%
GAA
Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF
9.39%18.76%6.67%7.65%-8.47%11.17%9.11%15.12%-7.15%15.11%

Correlation

The correlation between VAMO and GAA is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2015

0.38

VAMO vs. GAA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VAMO
GAA

Financial Services

38.8%
17.5%

Energy

34.0%
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

33.5%
8.5%

Industrials

21.4%
14.2%

Healthcare

17.5%
3.2%

Technology

8.3%
8.7%

Basic Materials

7.3%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
3.5%

Communication Services

5.0%
4.0%

Utilities

1.6%
3.8%

Real Estate

-

13.9%

Financial Services

VAMO
38.8%
GAA
17.5%

Energy

VAMO
34.0%
GAA
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VAMO
33.5%
GAA
8.5%

Industrials

VAMO
21.4%
GAA
14.2%

Healthcare

VAMO
17.5%
GAA
3.2%

Technology

VAMO
8.3%
GAA
8.7%

Basic Materials

VAMO
7.3%
GAA
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

VAMO
6.5%
GAA
3.5%

Communication Services

VAMO
5.0%
GAA
4.0%

Utilities

VAMO
1.6%
GAA
3.8%

Real Estate

VAMO

-

GAA
13.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAMO vs. GAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAMO
VAMO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

GAA
GAA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAMO vs. GAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VAMOGAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.46

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

3.93

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.47

15.04

-5.57

VAMO vs. GAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the GAA Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAMO and GAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VAMOGAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

2.48

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.57

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.70

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.63

-0.39

Drawdowns

VAMO vs. GAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAMO drawdown since its inception was -41.84%, which is greater than GAA's maximum drawdown of -26.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAMO and GAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAMOGAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.84%

-26.57%

-15.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.55%

-5.78%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.61%

-7.18%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.25%

-18.47%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.84%

-26.57%

-15.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

-0.66%

-2.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.98%

-3.85%

-6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.51%

+0.41%

Volatility

VAMO vs. GAA - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) at 2.60%. This indicates that VAMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAMOGAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

2.60%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

7.41%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

9.19%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

11.28%

+6.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

11.09%

+7.00%

VAMO vs. GAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAMO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GAA's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

VAMO vs. GAA - Dividend Comparison

VAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than GAA's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAA
Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF
3.59%4.24%3.88%3.73%6.05%4.21%2.73%3.32%3.01%2.36%2.82%2.49%
VAMO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
0.63%1.41%0.84%1.35%1.10%1.07%1.03%1.15%1.03%0.35%0.56%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAMO and GAA have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VAMO has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to GAA (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAMO dropped -41.84% vs GAA's -26.57%.

On 10-year performance, GAA leads with 7.72% vs 5.64% for VAMO. On fees, GAA is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, GAA has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GAA has performed better with a 7.72% return vs 5.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GAA is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for VAMO.

GAA has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.63% for VAMO.

VAMO is categorized as Momentum, while GAA is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for VAMO and 0.41% for GAA.

GAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAMO and GAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer