PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VALU vs. ICE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VALU vs. ICE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Value Line, Inc. (VALU) and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VALU achieves a -6.86% return, which is significantly higher than ICE's -17.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VALU having a 11.48% annualized return and ICE not far ahead at 11.85%.


VALU

1D
1.61%
1M
6.50%
YTD
-6.86%
6M
-7.19%
1Y
-5.25%
3Y*
-7.47%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
11.48%

ICE

1D
1.26%
1M
-12.73%
YTD
-17.31%
6M
-17.30%
1Y
-25.05%
3Y*
7.52%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VALU vs. ICE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VALU
Value Line, Inc.
-6.86%-24.86%11.27%-1.94%10.35%45.98%17.42%15.09%40.56%3.28%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
-17.31%9.92%17.46%27.12%-23.91%19.94%26.15%24.47%8.11%26.60%

Correlation

The correlation between VALU and ICE is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VALU:

$330.08M

ICE:

$75.81B

EPS

VALU:

$2.34

ICE:

$6.85

PE Ratio

VALU:

15.02

ICE:

19.43

PS Ratio

VALU:

9.77

ICE:

5.82

PB Ratio

VALU:

3.06

ICE:

2.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

VALU:

$33.83M

ICE:

$13.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VALU:

$17.97M

ICE:

$8.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

VALU:

$5.80M

ICE:

$7.05B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VALU vs. ICE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VALU
VALU Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
VALU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VALU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALU Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ICE
ICE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
ICE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
ICE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICE Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VALU vs. ICE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Value Line, Inc. (VALU) and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VALUICEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.81

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

-0.85

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.70

-1.75

+1.05

VALU vs. ICE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VALU Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is higher than the ICE Sharpe Ratio of -1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VALU and ICE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VALU vs. ICE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VALU drawdown since its inception was -77.54%, roughly equal to the maximum ICE drawdown of -73.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALU and ICE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VALUICEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.54%

-73.94%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.84%

-29.41%

+11.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.43%

-29.41%

-14.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.15%

-34.32%

-32.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.15%

-34.32%

-32.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.33%

-28.52%

-32.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.11%

-16.48%

-16.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.50%

14.36%

-6.86%

Volatility

VALU vs. ICE - Volatility Comparison

Value Line, Inc. (VALU) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) at 7.79%. This indicates that VALU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VALUICEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.74%

7.79%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.53%

19.16%

-2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.84%

22.42%

+5.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.79%

21.19%

+39.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.62%

22.24%

+35.38%

Dividends

VALU vs. ICE - Dividend Comparison

VALU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than ICE's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
1.50%1.19%1.21%1.31%1.48%0.97%1.04%1.19%1.27%1.13%1.21%1.13%
VALU
Value Line, Inc.
3.77%3.32%2.23%2.24%1.91%1.86%2.52%2.73%3.65%3.67%3.44%4.37%

Financials

VALU vs. ICE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Value Line, Inc. and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
8.28M
3.67B
(VALU) Total Revenue
(ICE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VALU vs. ICE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Value Line, Inc. and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
56.4%
78.8%
Portfolio components
VALU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Value Line, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.66M and revenue of 8.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.4%.

ICE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.89B and revenue of 3.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.8%.

VALU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Value Line, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.00M and revenue of 8.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

ICE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 3.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.4%.

VALU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Value Line, Inc. reported a net income of 5.91M and revenue of 8.28M, resulting in a net margin of 71.4%.

ICE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41B and revenue of 3.67B, resulting in a net margin of 38.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VALU and ICE have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VALU has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to ICE (7.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VALU dropped -77.54% vs ICE's -73.94%.

VALU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.19 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VALU and ICE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer