VALU vs. VOO
VALU (Value Line, Inc.) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, VALU returned 10.59%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for VOO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VALU vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VALU achieves a -15.19% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, VALU has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.59%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.
VALU
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- -7.25%
- YTD
- -15.19%
- 6M
- -15.56%
- 1Y
- -13.42%
- 3Y*
- -9.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.59%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
VALU vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VALU Value Line, Inc. | -15.19% | -24.86% | 11.27% | -1.94% | 10.35% | 45.98% | 17.42% | 15.09% | 40.56% | 3.28% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between VALU and VOO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VALU vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
VALU
VOO
VALU vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Value Line, Inc. (VALU) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VALU | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.43 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 3.16 | -3.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.96 | 14.73 | -16.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VALU | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | 2.39 | -2.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.83 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.87 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.89 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
VALU vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VALU drawdown since its inception was -77.54%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALU and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VALU | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.54% | -33.99% | -43.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.84% | -8.90% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.43% | -18.69% | -24.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.15% | -24.52% | -42.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.15% | -33.99% | -33.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.79% | -0.70% | -64.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.07% | -3.69% | -29.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.87% | 1.91% | +4.96% |
Volatility
VALU vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Value Line, Inc. (VALU) has a higher volatility of 6.80% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that VALU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VALU | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.80% | 2.84% | +3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.75% | 8.90% | +8.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.86% | 11.80% | +16.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.86% | 16.81% | +44.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.75% | 18.01% | +39.74% |
Dividends
VALU vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
VALU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VALU Value Line, Inc. | 4.14% | 3.32% | 2.23% | 2.24% | 1.91% | 1.86% | 2.52% | 2.73% | 3.65% | 3.67% | 3.44% | 4.37% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VALU and VOO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VALU has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VALU dropped -77.54% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VALU and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer