V vs. SMH
V (Visa Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, V returned 15.72%/yr vs 36.02%/yr for SMH. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
V vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, V achieves a -7.36% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 58.19% return. Over the past 10 years, V has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 15.72%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 36.02% annualized return.
V
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- -7.36%
- 6M
- -1.91%
- 1Y
- -11.08%
- 3Y*
- 13.20%
- 5Y*
- 7.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.72%
SMH
- 1D
- -9.22%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 58.19%
- 6M
- 56.81%
- 1Y
- 127.40%
- 3Y*
- 58.39%
- 5Y*
- 36.10%
- 10Y*
- 36.02%
V vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V Visa Inc. | -7.36% | 11.76% | 22.32% | 26.31% | -3.40% | -0.31% | 17.12% | 43.33% | 16.49% | 47.18% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 58.19% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between V and SMH is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2008 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between V and SMH has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
V vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
V
SMH
V vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Visa Inc. (V) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| V | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.59 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 8.58 | -9.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 32.42 | -33.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| V | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 4.00 | -4.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 1.03 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 1.11 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.32 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
V vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum V drawdown since its inception was -51.90%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| V | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.90% | -84.96% | +33.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.38% | -14.93% | -5.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.38% | -35.74% | +15.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.60% | -45.30% | +16.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.36% | -45.30% | +8.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.64% | -10.69% | -1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -41.08% | +32.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.00% | 3.94% | +7.06% |
Volatility
V vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Visa Inc. (V) is 5.65%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.88%. This indicates that V experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| V | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 14.88% | -9.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.47% | 26.35% | -8.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.27% | 32.03% | -9.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 35.24% | -12.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.46% | 32.70% | -8.24% |
Dividends
V vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
V's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than SMH's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
V Visa Inc. | 0.80% | 0.70% | 0.68% | 0.72% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 0.56% | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.61% | 0.75% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
V and SMH have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (14.88%) compared to V (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, V dropped -51.90% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for V and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer