UYM vs. ROM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UYM (ProShares Ultra Basic Materials) and ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - UYM tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%) while ROM tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UYM returned 11.91%/yr vs 42.70%/yr for ROM. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

UYM vs. ROM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYM achieves a 25.72% return, which is significantly lower than ROM's 77.72% return. Over the past 10 years, UYM has underperformed ROM with an annualized return of 11.91%, while ROM has yielded a comparatively higher 42.70% annualized return.

UYM

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 3.42%
• YTD: 25.72%
• 6M: 31.43%
• 1Y: 32.36%
• 3Y*: 13.51%
• 5Y*: 3.33%
• 10Y*: 11.91%

ROM

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: 45.36%
• YTD: 77.72%
• 6M: 74.45%
• 1Y: 152.07%
• 3Y*: 59.24%
• 5Y*: 31.70%
• 10Y*: 42.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UYM vs. ROM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UYM ProShares Ultra Basic Materials	25.72%	9.46%	-8.00%	17.47%	-23.10%	54.58%	16.56%	35.09%	-35.68%	51.51%
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology	77.72%	35.63%	31.65%	130.70%	-63.86%	77.75%	80.42%	102.10%	-9.89%	81.11%

Correlation

The correlation between UYM and ROM is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007	0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between UYM and ROM has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UYM vs. ROM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UYM	ROM
Basic Materials	87.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	-
Industrials	1.1%	0.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.1%
Financial Services	-	3.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	55.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

UYM vs. ROM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYM

UYM Risk / Return Rank: 27
UYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
UYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
UYM Omega Ratio Rank: 26
UYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
UYM Martin Ratio Rank: 27

ROM

ROM Risk / Return Rank: 83
ROM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ROM Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ROM Omega Ratio Rank: 80
ROM Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
ROM Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYM vs. ROM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UYM	ROM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	3.66	-2.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	3.69	-2.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.48	-0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	4.73	-3.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.71	14.47	-10.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UYM vs. ROM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYM Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the ROM Sharpe Ratio of 3.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYM and ROM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UYM	ROM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	3.66	-2.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	0.62	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	0.86	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.54	-0.45

Drawdowns

UYM vs. ROM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYM drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, which is greater than ROM's maximum drawdown of -83.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYM and ROM.

Drawdown Indicators

	UYM	ROM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.77%	-83.36%	-9.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.85%	-32.33%	+8.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.88%	-48.10%	+4.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.25%	-67.55%	+19.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.31%	-67.55%	-5.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.94%	-2.01%	-6.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.11%	-20.88%	-21.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.73%	10.55%	-1.82%

Volatility

UYM vs. ROM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) is 11.55%, while ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a volatility of 14.00%. This indicates that UYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UYM	ROM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.55%	14.00%	-2.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.84%	33.37%	-7.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.71%	41.83%	-8.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.26%	51.63%	-12.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.76%	49.82%	-7.06%

UYM vs. ROM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UYM and ROM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

UYM vs. ROM - Dividend Comparison

UYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than ROM's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology	0.14%	0.24%	0.21%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	0.16%	0.30%	0.08%	0.20%	0.12%
UYM ProShares Ultra Basic Materials	1.21%	1.47%	0.98%	0.28%	0.88%	0.52%	0.56%	1.24%	0.94%	0.38%	0.55%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UYM and ROM in my portfolio?

UYM and ROM have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UYM or ROM?

ROM has higher volatility (14.00%) compared to UYM (11.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYM dropped -92.77% vs ROM's -83.36%.

Which ETF is better, UYM or ROM?

On 10-year performance, ROM leads with 42.70% vs 11.91% for UYM. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UYM has been the lower-risk option at 11.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UYM or ROM?

Over the 10-year period, ROM has performed better with a 42.70% return vs 11.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UYM or ROM?

UYM and ROM have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UYM or ROM?

UYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.14% for ROM.

What is the main difference between UYM and ROM?

UYM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%), while ROM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.66 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.