PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UYM vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UYM vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYM achieves a 25.08% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 65.71% return. Over the past 10 years, UYM has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 11.85%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.44% annualized return.


UYM

1D
2.40%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
25.08%
6M
32.48%
1Y
34.35%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
11.85%

TQQQ

1D
1.37%
1M
33.57%
YTD
65.71%
6M
58.23%
1Y
145.30%
3Y*
69.92%
5Y*
29.86%
10Y*
45.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UYM vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UYM
ProShares Ultra Basic Materials
25.08%9.46%-8.00%17.47%-23.10%54.58%16.56%35.09%-35.68%51.51%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
65.71%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between UYM and TQQQ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.62

The correlation between UYM and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UYM vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UYM
TQQQ

Basic Materials

87.6%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
12.3%

Industrials

1.1%
2.8%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Basic Materials

UYM
87.6%
TQQQ
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

UYM
12.4%
TQQQ
12.3%

Industrials

UYM
1.1%
TQQQ
2.8%

Communication Services

UYM

-

TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

UYM

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

UYM

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

UYM

-

TQQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

UYM

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

UYM

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Technology

UYM

-

TQQQ
53.8%

Utilities

UYM

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UYM vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYM
UYM Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
UYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
UYM Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
UYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
UYM Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYM vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UYMTQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

3.07

-2.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.55

3.19

-1.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.42

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

4.08

-2.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.09

13.38

-9.29

UYM vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYM Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYM and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UYMTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

3.07

-2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.45

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.69

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.74

-0.65

Drawdowns

UYM vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYM drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYM and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UYMTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.77%

-81.66%

-11.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.85%

-36.97%

+13.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.88%

-58.04%

+14.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.25%

-81.66%

+33.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.31%

-81.66%

+8.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.40%

0.00%

-9.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.12%

-18.53%

-23.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.72%

11.28%

-2.56%

Volatility

UYM vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) is 12.00%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that UYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UYMTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.00%

13.26%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.85%

36.05%

-10.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.72%

47.63%

-13.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.26%

66.55%

-27.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.77%

65.98%

-23.21%

UYM vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UYM and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

UYM vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

UYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%
UYM
ProShares Ultra Basic Materials
1.21%1.47%0.98%0.28%0.88%0.52%0.56%1.24%0.94%0.38%0.55%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


UYM and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to UYM (12.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYM dropped -92.77% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.44% vs 11.85% for UYM. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UYM has been the lower-risk option at 12.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.44% return vs 11.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UYM and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

UYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

UYM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UYM and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer