UXRP vs. QLD
UXRP (ProShares Ultra XRP ETF) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - UXRP is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg XRP Index, while QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UXRP charges 1.67%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QLD.
Performance
UXRP vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXRP achieves a -75.49% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 28.12% return.
UXRP
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -7.58%
- 6M
- -80.56%
- YTD
- -75.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLD
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- 6M
- 23.12%
- YTD
- 28.12%
- 1Y
- 52.34%
- 3Y*
- 39.12%
- 5Y*
- 19.39%
- 10Y*
- 34.28%
UXRP vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF | -75.49% | -77.43% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 28.12% | 18.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXRP and QLD is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXRP vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
UXRP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QLD
UXRP vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UXRP | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UXRP vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXRP drawdown since its inception was -96.60%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXRP and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXRP | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.60% | -83.13% | -13.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.11% | -10.29% | -85.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.69% | -18.11% | -55.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.66% | — |
Volatility
UXRP vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXRP | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 146.51% | 37.07% | +109.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 146.51% | 45.56% | +100.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 146.51% | 44.86% | +101.65% |
UXRP vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
UXRP has a 1.67% expense ratio, which is higher than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
UXRP vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
UXRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than QLD's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UXRP and QLD have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QLD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QLD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.67% for UXRP.
QLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.02% for UXRP.
UXRP is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while QLD is Leveraged Equities. UXRP tracks Bloomberg XRP Index, while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 1.67% for UXRP and 0.95% for QLD.
Find the right allocation for UXRP and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer