UXAP vs. QB
UXAP (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. UXAP is actively managed, while QB is passively managed. Over the past year, UXAP returned 22.00% vs 18.61% for QB. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UXAP charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QB.
Performance
UXAP vs. QB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXAP achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 12.42% return.
UXAP
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 22.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 1Y
- 18.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXAP vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UXAP FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April | 10.75% | 13.58% |
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 12.42% | 6.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXAP and QB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.79 |
The correlation between UXAP and QB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXAP vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank
UXAP
QB
UXAP vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April (UXAP) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UXAP | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.63 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 5.38 | -3.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.04 | 25.93 | -16.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UXAP vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXAP drawdown since its inception was -10.45%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -3.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXAP and QB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXAP | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.45% | -3.47% | -6.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.45% | -3.47% | -6.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -0.22% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.33% | -0.42% | -0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 0.72% | +1.72% |
Volatility
UXAP vs. QB - Volatility Comparison
FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April (UXAP) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) at 2.71%. This indicates that UXAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXAP | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 2.71% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 5.83% | +5.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.40% | 7.03% | +7.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 6.91% | +7.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 6.91% | +7.62% |
UXAP vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison
UXAP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
UXAP vs. QB - Dividend Comparison
UXAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 0.77% | 0.48% |
UXAP FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UXAP and QB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UXAP has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to QB (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXAP dropped -10.45% vs QB's -3.47%.
On 1-year performance, UXAP leads with 22.00% vs 18.61% for QB. On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, QB has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UXAP has performed better with a 22.00% return vs 18.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXAP.
QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for UXAP.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXAP and 0.58% for QB.
QB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UXAP and QB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer