UXAP vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UXAP (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - UXAP is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. UXAP is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past year, UXAP returned 29.33% vs 91.89% for BNO. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. UXAP charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

UXAP vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April (UXAP) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UXAP achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.

UXAP

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 5.70%
• YTD: 11.50%
• 6M: 11.41%
• 1Y: 29.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -10.29%
• YTD: 90.47%
• 6M: 86.00%
• 1Y: 91.89%
• 3Y*: 27.93%
• 5Y*: 24.16%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UXAP vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UXAP FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April	11.50%	35.69%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	90.47%	1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between UXAP and BNO is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2025	-0.26

Return for Risk

UXAP vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UXAP

UXAP Risk / Return Rank: 65
UXAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
UXAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
UXAP Omega Ratio Rank: 64
UXAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
UXAP Martin Ratio Rank: 70

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UXAP vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April (UXAP) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UXAP	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.23	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	2.73	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.38	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	5.17	-2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.81	9.76	+3.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UXAP vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UXAP Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UXAP and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UXAP	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	2.23	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.18	0.14	+3.04

Drawdowns

UXAP vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UXAP drawdown since its inception was -10.45%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXAP and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	UXAP	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.45%	-87.06%	+76.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.45%	-17.87%	+7.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-10.29%	+9.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.24%	-40.17%	+38.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.29%	9.45%	-7.16%

Volatility

UXAP vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April (UXAP) is 3.26%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that UXAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UXAP	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.26%	14.22%	-10.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.36%	36.10%	-25.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.59%	41.46%	-27.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.15%	35.38%	-21.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.15%	36.68%	-22.53%

UXAP vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UXAP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

UXAP vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

Neither UXAP nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UXAP and BNO in my portfolio?

UXAP and BNO have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UXAP or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to UXAP (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXAP dropped -10.45% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, UXAP or BNO?

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 91.89% vs 29.33% for UXAP. On fees, UXAP is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, UXAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UXAP or BNO?

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 91.89% return vs 29.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UXAP or BNO?

UXAP is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UXAP or BNO?

UXAP and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between UXAP and BNO?

UXAP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXAP and 0.90% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.