UXAP vs. SMAX
UXAP (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April) and SMAX (iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, UXAP returned 29.33% vs 9.17% for SMAX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UXAP charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SMAX.
Performance
UXAP vs. SMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXAP achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly higher than SMAX's 3.09% return.
UXAP
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 5.70%
- YTD
- 11.50%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 29.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMAX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- 1Y
- 9.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXAP vs. SMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UXAP FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April | 11.50% | 35.69% |
SMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF | 3.09% | 10.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXAP and SMAX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2025 | 0.86 |
The correlation between UXAP and SMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXAP vs. SMAX — Risk / Return Rank
UXAP
SMAX
UXAP vs. SMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April (UXAP) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UXAP | SMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.75 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 4.81 | -1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.81 | 26.11 | -13.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UXAP | SMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 3.46 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.18 | 2.01 | +1.18 |
Drawdowns
UXAP vs. SMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXAP drawdown since its inception was -10.45%, which is greater than SMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXAP and SMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXAP | SMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.45% | -3.90% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.45% | -1.91% | -8.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.09% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.24% | -0.40% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 0.35% | +1.94% |
Volatility
UXAP vs. SMAX - Volatility Comparison
FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April (UXAP) has a higher volatility of 3.26% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX) at 0.38%. This indicates that UXAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXAP | SMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 0.38% | +2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.36% | 2.10% | +8.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.59% | 2.67% | +10.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 3.67% | +10.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 3.67% | +10.48% |
UXAP vs. SMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UXAP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UXAP vs. SMAX - Dividend Comparison
UXAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF | 0.95% | 0.98% | 0.27% |
UXAP FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UXAP and SMAX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UXAP has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to SMAX (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXAP dropped -10.45% vs SMAX's -3.90%.
On 1-year performance, UXAP leads with 29.33% vs 9.17% for SMAX. On fees, SMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UXAP has performed better with a 29.33% return vs 9.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXAP.
SMAX has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for UXAP.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXAP and 0.50% for SMAX.
SMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UXAP and SMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer