UWM vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

UWM (ProShares Ultra Russell2000) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UWM is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UWM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

UWM vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UWM achieves a 38.52% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 266.23% return.

UWM

• 1D: 3.34%
• 1M: -1.55%
• 6M: 23.05%
• YTD: 38.52%
• 1Y: 76.90%
• 3Y*: 22.09%
• 5Y*: 4.52%
• 10Y*: 11.49%
• ALL TIME*: 7.33%

LINT

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -46.62%
• 6M: 135.02%
• YTD: 266.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$19.84M	$20.02M	$35.16M
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000	$17.74M	$17.63M	$19.86M

UWM vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000	38.52%	10.89%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	266.23%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between UWM and LINT is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.49

UWM vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UWM	LINT
Financial Services	41.4%	-
Healthcare	11.1%	-
Technology	7.8%	100.0%
Industrials	7.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	-
Real Estate	4.0%	-
Energy	3.4%	-
Basic Materials	2.6%	-
Utilities	1.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	-
Communication Services	0.9%	-

Return for Risk

UWM vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UWM

UWM Risk / Return Rank: 81
UWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
UWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
UWM Omega Ratio Rank: 72
UWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
UWM Martin Ratio Rank: 83

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UWM vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UWM	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.47	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.84	—	—

Drawdowns

UWM vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UWM drawdown since its inception was -88.21%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UWM and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	UWM	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.21%	-69.02%	-19.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-71.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.36%	-62.23%	+58.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.64%	-24.07%	-6.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UWM	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.22%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.96%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.36%	169.02%	-130.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.94%	169.02%	-124.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.03%	169.02%	-122.99%

UWM vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

UWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

UWM vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

UWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than LINT's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.74%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000	0.81%	1.05%	1.16%	0.34%	0.40%	0.00%	0.07%	0.55%	0.41%	0.11%	0.27%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UWM and LINT in my portfolio?

UWM and LINT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UWM or LINT?

On fees, UWM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UWM or LINT?

UWM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UWM or LINT?

UWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.74% for LINT.

What is the main difference between UWM and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UWM and 0.97% for LINT.