UTWO vs. UTEN
UTWO (US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF) and UTEN (US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF) are both Government Bonds funds from US Benchmark Series - UTWO tracks the ICE BofA Current 2 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross while UTEN tracks the ICE BofA Current 10 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UTWO returned 3.78%/yr vs 1.86%/yr for UTEN. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
UTWO vs. UTEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTWO achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly higher than UTEN's -0.69% return.
UTWO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- 3.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UTEN
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- -1.30%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 1.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UTWO vs. UTEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTWO US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF | 0.33% | 4.79% | 3.71% | 3.45% | -0.81% |
UTEN US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF | -0.69% | 7.82% | -1.67% | 3.18% | -7.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTWO and UTEN is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022 | 0.79 |
The correlation between UTWO and UTEN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTWO vs. UTEN — Risk / Return Rank
UTWO
UTEN
UTWO vs. UTEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) and US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTWO | UTEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.14 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 0.94 | +2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.89 | 2.82 | +10.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTWO | UTEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 0.82 | +1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.45 | 0.01 | +1.44 |
Drawdowns
UTWO vs. UTEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTWO drawdown since its inception was -2.04%, smaller than the maximum UTEN drawdown of -13.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWO and UTEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTWO | UTEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -13.36% | +11.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.90% | -4.57% | +3.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.08% | -8.60% | +7.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -3.05% | +2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.49% | -4.82% | +4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.24% | 1.51% | -1.27% |
Volatility
UTWO vs. UTEN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) is 0.36%, while US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) has a volatility of 1.71%. This indicates that UTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTWO | UTEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.36% | 1.71% | -1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.92% | 3.65% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35% | 5.24% | -3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.07% | 8.05% | -5.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.07% | 8.05% | -5.98% |
UTWO vs. UTEN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UTWO and UTEN have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UTWO vs. UTEN - Dividend Comparison
UTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than UTEN's 4.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTEN US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF | 4.05% | 4.11% | 4.13% | 3.62% | 1.39% |
UTWO US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF | 3.50% | 3.63% | 4.22% | 4.39% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTWO and UTEN have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UTEN has higher volatility (1.71%) compared to UTWO (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTWO dropped -2.04% vs UTEN's -13.36%.
On 3-year performance, UTWO leads with 3.78% vs 1.86% for UTEN. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, UTWO has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, UTWO has performed better with a 3.78% return vs 1.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UTWO and UTEN have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
UTEN has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 3.50% for UTWO.
UTWO tracks ICE BofA Current 2 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while UTEN tracks ICE BofA Current 10 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross.
UTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTWO and UTEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer