UTF vs. NMFC
UTF (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc) and NMFC (New Mountain Finance Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, UTF returned 11.75%/yr vs 6.45%/yr for NMFC. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UTF vs. NMFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTF achieves a 17.84% return, which is significantly higher than NMFC's -9.98% return. Over the past 10 years, UTF has outperformed NMFC with an annualized return of 11.75%, while NMFC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.45% annualized return.
UTF
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 17.84%
- 6M
- 19.68%
- 1Y
- 14.41%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
NMFC
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -9.98%
- 6M
- -11.66%
- 1Y
- -13.61%
- 3Y*
- -3.21%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- 6.45%
UTF vs. NMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 17.84% | 9.93% | 22.37% | -3.83% | -9.60% | 17.91% | 6.93% | 42.74% | -9.87% | 34.10% |
NMFC New Mountain Finance Corporation | -9.98% | -7.17% | -0.95% | 15.47% | -0.55% | 31.94% | -7.13% | 20.64% | 2.78% | 5.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTF and NMFC is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2011 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UTF and NMFC has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
UTF:
$6.79
NMFC:
$328.53
UTF:
4.03
NMFC:
0.02
UTF:
6.85
NMFC:
2.35
UTF:
$387.16M
NMFC:
$315.55M
UTF:
$388.42M
NMFC:
$203.95M
UTF:
$765.72M
NMFC:
$106.53M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTF vs. NMFC — Risk / Return Rank
UTF
NMFC
UTF vs. NMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) and New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTF | NMFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.90 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | -0.62 | +1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.79 | -1.20 | +3.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTF vs. NMFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTF drawdown since its inception was -72.62%, which is greater than NMFC's maximum drawdown of -64.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTF and NMFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTF | NMFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.62% | -64.16% | -8.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.33% | -24.56% | +14.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.06% | -27.77% | +6.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.28% | -27.77% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.53% | -64.16% | +11.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -21.72% | +21.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.36% | -5.47% | -4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | 12.70% | -7.65% |
Volatility
UTF vs. NMFC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) is 2.43%, while New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that UTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTF | NMFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.43% | 6.36% | -3.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.40% | 18.29% | -9.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.40% | 22.70% | -10.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 18.51% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.34% | 25.91% | -2.57% |
Dividends
UTF vs. NMFC - Dividend Comparison
UTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.87%, less than NMFC's 16.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMFC New Mountain Finance Corporation | 16.10% | 13.90% | 12.17% | 11.40% | 9.86% | 8.76% | 10.92% | 9.90% | 10.81% | 10.04% | 9.65% | 10.45% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 6.87% | 7.62% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% |
Financials
UTF vs. NMFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc and New Mountain Finance Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
UTF and NMFC have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NMFC has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to UTF (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTF dropped -72.62% vs NMFC's -64.16%.
UTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTF and NMFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer