PortfoliosLab logo
NMFC vs. DGRO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NMFC and DGRO is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

NMFC vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NMFC:

-0.44

DGRO:

0.78

Sortino Ratio

NMFC:

-0.49

DGRO:

1.12

Omega Ratio

NMFC:

0.93

DGRO:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

NMFC:

-0.39

DGRO:

0.79

Martin Ratio

NMFC:

-1.14

DGRO:

3.10

Ulcer Index

NMFC:

8.14%

DGRO:

3.57%

Daily Std Dev

NMFC:

20.71%

DGRO:

15.20%

Max Drawdown

NMFC:

-64.16%

DGRO:

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

NMFC:

-10.13%

DGRO:

-3.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMFC achieves a -1.53% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 1.76% return. Over the past 10 years, NMFC has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 6.66%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.38% annualized return.


NMFC

YTD

-1.53%

1M

10.01%

6M

-4.53%

1Y

-9.24%

3Y*

3.25%

5Y*

12.79%

10Y*

6.66%

DGRO

YTD

1.76%

1M

3.53%

6M

-3.30%

1Y

10.31%

3Y*

9.13%

5Y*

13.13%

10Y*

11.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


New Mountain Finance Corporation

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NMFC vs. DGRO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMFC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NMFC is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NMFC is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NMFC is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NMFC is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NMFC is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NMFC is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DGRO is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DGRO is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DGRO is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DGRO is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DGRO is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DGRO is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NMFC vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NMFC Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMFC and DGRO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NMFC vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

NMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, more than DGRO's 2.23% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NMFC
New Mountain Finance Corporation
6.31%6.04%11.71%9.86%8.76%10.92%9.90%10.81%10.04%9.65%10.45%9.91%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
2.23%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%0.97%

Drawdowns

NMFC vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMFC drawdown since its inception was -64.16%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMFC and DGRO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NMFC vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 4.35%. This indicates that NMFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...