NMFC vs. GSBD
Compare and contrast key facts about New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) and Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NMFC or GSBD.
Performance
NMFC vs. GSBD - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMFC achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than GSBD's -3.74% return.
NMFC
-0.11%
1.82%
-1.60%
2.68%
8.22%
8.08%
GSBD
-3.74%
-4.24%
-9.88%
-2.25%
2.09%
N/A
Fundamentals
| NMFC | GSBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.24B | $1.51B |
| EPS | $1.04 | $0.68 |
| PE Ratio | 11.08 | 18.90 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 2.15 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $289.76M | $368.90M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $207.78M | $318.67M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $223.09M | $175.96M |
Key characteristics
| NMFC | GSBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.23 | -0.16 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.42 | -0.12 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.05 | 0.98 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.22 | -0.14 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.94 | -0.35 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.84% | 6.38% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.50% | 14.01% |
| Max Drawdown | -64.16% | -62.67% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.41% | -14.72% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between NMFC and GSBD is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NMFC vs. GSBD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) and Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NMFC vs. GSBD - Dividend Comparison
NMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.07%, less than GSBD's 13.98% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMFC New Mountain Finance Corporation | 12.07% | 11.71% | 9.86% | 8.76% | 10.92% | 9.90% | 10.81% | 10.04% | 9.65% | 10.45% | 9.91% | 9.84% |
GSBD Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. | 13.98% | 12.29% | 13.12% | 10.18% | 9.41% | 8.46% | 9.79% | 8.12% | 7.65% | 9.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NMFC vs. GSBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMFC drawdown since its inception was -64.16%, roughly equal to the maximum GSBD drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMFC and GSBD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NMFC vs. GSBD - Volatility Comparison
New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) has a higher volatility of 6.60% compared to Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) at 5.07%. This indicates that NMFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
NMFC vs. GSBD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between New Mountain Finance Corporation and Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities